mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Filter out all unsupported controls when eVMCS was activated
Date: Tue,  7 Sep 2021 18:35:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210907163530.110066-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> (raw)

Windows Server 2022 with Hyper-V role enabled failed to boot on KVM when
enlightened VMCS is advertised. Debugging revealed there are two exposed
secondary controls it is not happy with: SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_VMFUNC and
SECONDARY_EXEC_SHADOW_VMCS. These controls are known to be unsupported,
as there are no corresponding fields in eVMCSv1 (see the comment above
EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_2NDEXEC definition).

Previously, commit 31de3d2500e4 ("x86/kvm/hyper-v: move VMX controls
sanitization out of nested_enable_evmcs()") introduced the required
filtering mechanism for VMX MSRs but for some reason put only known
to be problematic (and not full EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_* lists) controls
there.

Note, Windows Server 2022 seems to have gained some sanity check for VMX
MSRs: it doesn't even try to launch a guest when there's something it
doesn't like, nested_evmcs_check_controls() mechanism can't catch the
problem.

Let's be bold this time and instead of playing whack-a-mole just filter out
all unsupported controls from VMX MSRs.

Fixes: 31de3d2500e4 ("x86/kvm/hyper-v: move VMX controls sanitization out of nested_enable_evmcs()")
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c | 12 +++++++++---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c   |  9 +++++----
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
index 0dab1b7b529f..ba6f99f584ac 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c
@@ -353,14 +353,20 @@ void nested_evmcs_filter_control_msr(u32 msr_index, u64 *pdata)
 	switch (msr_index) {
 	case MSR_IA32_VMX_EXIT_CTLS:
 	case MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_EXIT_CTLS:
-		ctl_high &= ~VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL;
+		ctl_high &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMEXIT_CTRL;
 		break;
 	case MSR_IA32_VMX_ENTRY_CTLS:
 	case MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_ENTRY_CTLS:
-		ctl_high &= ~VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL;
+		ctl_high &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMENTRY_CTRL;
 		break;
 	case MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS2:
-		ctl_high &= ~SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES;
+		ctl_high &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_2NDEXEC;
+		break;
+	case MSR_IA32_VMX_PINBASED_CTLS:
+		ctl_high &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_PINCTRL;
+		break;
+	case MSR_IA32_VMX_VMFUNC:
+		ctl_low &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMFUNC;
 		break;
 	}
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index fada1055f325..d7c5257eb5c0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -1837,10 +1837,11 @@ static int vmx_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 				    &msr_info->data))
 			return 1;
 		/*
-		 * Enlightened VMCS v1 doesn't have certain fields, but buggy
-		 * Hyper-V versions are still trying to use corresponding
-		 * features when they are exposed. Filter out the essential
-		 * minimum.
+		 * Enlightened VMCS v1 doesn't have certain VMCS fields but
+		 * instead of just ignoring the features, different Hyper-V
+		 * versions are either trying to use them and fail or do some
+		 * sanity checking and refuse to boot. Filter all unsupported
+		 * features out.
 		 */
 		if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
 		    vmx->nested.enlightened_vmcs_enabled)
-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-09-07 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-07 16:35 Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2021-09-08 21:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-09  7:03   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-09-22 14:07     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-22 14:07 ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210907163530.110066-1-vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®