From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
To: Lucas tanure <tanureal@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Sanjay R Mehta <sanju.mehta@amd.com>,
Nehal Bakulchandra Shah <Nehal-Bakulchandra.shah@amd.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@opensource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] spi: amd: Don't wait for a write-only transfer to finish
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 14:11:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210910141112.GZ9223@ediswmail.ad.cirrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <790250e3-a928-57d4-1378-bc8923163452@opensource.cirrus.com>
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 02:47:32PM +0100, Lucas tanure wrote:
> On 9/10/21 1:42 PM, Charles Keepax wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 12:15:29PM +0100, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> >>Return from a write-only transfer without waiting for
> >>it to finish
> >>But wait before a new transfer as the previous may
> >>still happening and also wait before reading the data
> >>from the FIFO
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <tanureal@opensource.cirrus.com>
> >>---
> >> static int amd_spi_master_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> >>@@ -178,6 +185,7 @@ static inline int amd_spi_fifo_xfer(struct amd_spi *amd_spi,
> >> amd_spi_clear_fifo_ptr(amd_spi);
> >> /* Execute command */
> >> amd_spi_execute_opcode(amd_spi);
> >>+ amd_spi_busy_wait(amd_spi);
> >
> >Surely the previous transfer can't still be happening if this if
> >unconditional? Should this not be gated on rx_len?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Charles
> >
> >> /* Read data from FIFO to receive buffer */
> >> for (i = 0; i < rx_len; i++)
> >> buf[i] = amd_spi_readreg8(amd_spi, AMD_SPI_FIFO_BASE + tx_len + i);
> >>--
> >>2.33.0
> >>
> This is executed inside an xfer->rx_buf not null if, so it`s gated
> in a read transfer and not for a write transfer only
>
And so it is, sorry should have looked at more than just the git
context there.
Reviewed-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Thanks,
Charles
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-10 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-10 11:15 [PATCH v2 1/4] spi: amd: Refactor code to use less spi_master_get_devdata Lucas Tanure
2021-09-10 11:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] spi: amd: Refactor amd_spi_busy_wait Lucas Tanure
2021-09-10 11:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] spi: amd: Remove unneeded variable Lucas Tanure
2021-09-10 11:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] spi: amd: Don't wait for a write-only transfer to finish Lucas Tanure
2021-09-10 12:42 ` Charles Keepax
2021-09-10 13:47 ` Lucas tanure
2021-09-10 14:11 ` Charles Keepax [this message]
2021-09-13 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] spi: amd: Refactor code to use less spi_master_get_devdata Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210910141112.GZ9223@ediswmail.ad.cirrus.com \
--to=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=Nehal-Bakulchandra.shah@amd.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=sanju.mehta@amd.com \
--cc=tanureal@opensource.cirrus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®