mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/10] KVM: x86: Remove defunct setting of XCR0 for guest during vCPU create
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 17:02:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210921000303.400537-6-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210921000303.400537-1-seanjc@google.com>

Drop code to initialize XCR0 during fx_init(), a.k.a. vCPU creation, as
XCR0 has been initialized during kvm_vcpu_reset() (for RESET) since
commit a554d207dc46 ("KVM: X86: Processor States following Reset or INIT").

Back when XCR0 support was added by commit 2acf923e38fb ("KVM: VMX:
Enable XSAVE/XRSTOR for guest"), KVM didn't differentiate between RESET
and INIT.  Ignoring the fact that calling fx_init() for INIT is obviously
wrong, e.g. FPU state after INIT is not the same as after RESET, setting
XCR0 in fx_init() was correct.

Eventually fx_init() got moved to kvm_arch_vcpu_init(), a.k.a. vCPU
creation (ignore the terrible name) by commit 0ee6a5172573 ("x86/fpu,
kvm: Simplify fx_init()").  Finally, commit 95a0d01eef7a ("KVM: x86: Move
all vcpu init code into kvm_arch_vcpu_create()") killed off
kvm_arch_vcpu_init(), leaving behind the oddity of redundant setting of
guest state during vCPU creation.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index e0bff5473813..6fd3fe21863e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -993,7 +993,7 @@ static int __kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 xcr)
 	/*
 	 * Do not allow the guest to set bits that we do not support
 	 * saving.  However, xcr0 bit 0 is always set, even if the
-	 * emulated CPU does not support XSAVE (see fx_init).
+	 * emulated CPU does not support XSAVE (see kvm_vcpu_reset()).
 	 */
 	valid_bits = vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xcr0 | XFEATURE_MASK_FP;
 	if (xcr0 & ~valid_bits)
@@ -10623,11 +10623,6 @@ static void fx_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES))
 		vcpu->arch.guest_fpu->state.xsave.header.xcomp_bv =
 			host_xcr0 | XSTATE_COMPACTION_ENABLED;
-
-	/*
-	 * Ensure guest xcr0 is valid for loading
-	 */
-	vcpu->arch.xcr0 = XFEATURE_MASK_FP;
 }
 
 void kvm_free_guest_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-- 
2.33.0.464.g1972c5931b-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-21  2:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-21  0:02 [PATCH v2 00/10] KVM: x86: Clean up RESET "emulation" Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21  0:02 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] KVM: x86: Mark all registers as avail/dirty at vCPU creation Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21 13:40   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-09-21  0:02 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] KVM: x86: Clear KVM's cached guest CR3 at RESET/INIT Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21 13:52   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-09-21 13:55     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-09-21 17:35   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-21  0:02 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] KVM: x86: Do not mark all registers as avail/dirty during RESET/INIT Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21  0:02 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] KVM: x86: Remove defunct setting of CR0.ET for guests during vCPU create Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21 14:23   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-09-21  0:02 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-09-21 14:37   ` [PATCH v2 05/10] KVM: x86: Remove defunct setting of XCR0 for guest " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-09-21  0:02 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] KVM: x86: Fold fx_init() into kvm_arch_vcpu_create() Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21 14:52   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-10-06 23:04     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21  0:03 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] KVM: VMX: Drop explicit zeroing of MSR guest values at vCPU creation Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21 15:02   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-09-21  0:03 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] KVM: VMX: Move RESET emulation to vmx_vcpu_reset() Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21  0:03 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] KVM: SVM: Move RESET emulation to svm_vcpu_reset() Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21  0:03 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] KVM: x86: WARN on non-zero CRs at RESET to detect improper initalization Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21 13:59   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-09-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] KVM: x86: Clean up RESET "emulation" Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210921000303.400537-6-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=reijiw@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®