From: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Cc: Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo <nums@google.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] x86/insn, tools/x86: Fix some potential undefined behavior.
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:14:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210923161440.746537-1-irogers@google.com> (raw)
From: Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo <nums@google.com>
Don't perform unaligned loads in __get_next and __peek_nbyte_next as
these are forms of undefined behavior.
These problems were identified using the undefined behavior sanitizer
(ubsan) with the tools version of the code and perf test. Part of this
patch was previously posted here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190724184512.162887-4-nums@google.com/
v3. Is a rebase picking up a fix for big endian architectures.
v2. removes the validate_next check and merges the 2 changes into one as
requested by Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo <nums@google.com>
---
arch/x86/lib/insn.c | 4 ++--
tools/arch/x86/lib/insn.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn.c
index 058f19b20465..c565def611e2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/insn.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn.c
@@ -37,10 +37,10 @@
((insn)->next_byte + sizeof(t) + n <= (insn)->end_kaddr)
#define __get_next(t, insn) \
- ({ t r = *(t*)insn->next_byte; insn->next_byte += sizeof(t); leXX_to_cpu(t, r); })
+ ({ t r; memcpy(&r, insn->next_byte, sizeof(t)); insn->next_byte += sizeof(t); leXX_to_cpu(t, r); })
#define __peek_nbyte_next(t, insn, n) \
- ({ t r = *(t*)((insn)->next_byte + n); leXX_to_cpu(t, r); })
+ ({ t r; memcpy(&r, (insn)->next_byte + n, sizeof(t)); leXX_to_cpu(t, r); })
#define get_next(t, insn) \
({ if (unlikely(!validate_next(t, insn, 0))) goto err_out; __get_next(t, insn); })
diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/lib/insn.c b/tools/arch/x86/lib/insn.c
index c41f95815480..bc11b5774a44 100644
--- a/tools/arch/x86/lib/insn.c
+++ b/tools/arch/x86/lib/insn.c
@@ -37,10 +37,10 @@
((insn)->next_byte + sizeof(t) + n <= (insn)->end_kaddr)
#define __get_next(t, insn) \
- ({ t r = *(t*)insn->next_byte; insn->next_byte += sizeof(t); leXX_to_cpu(t, r); })
+ ({ t r; memcpy(&r, insn->next_byte, sizeof(t)); insn->next_byte += sizeof(t); leXX_to_cpu(t, r);; })
#define __peek_nbyte_next(t, insn, n) \
- ({ t r = *(t*)((insn)->next_byte + n); leXX_to_cpu(t, r); })
+ ({ t r; memcpy(&r, (insn)->next_byte + n, sizeof(t)); leXX_to_cpu(t, r);; })
#define get_next(t, insn) \
({ if (unlikely(!validate_next(t, insn, 0))) goto err_out; __get_next(t, insn); })
--
2.33.0.464.g1972c5931b-goog
reply other threads:[~2021-09-23 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210923161440.746537-1-irogers@google.com \
--to=irogers@google.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nums@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®