From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E82C433F5 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:18:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B5560F6B for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:18:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234022AbhI0LUS (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2021 07:20:18 -0400 Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([62.96.220.36]:37568 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233897AbhI0LUO (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2021 07:20:14 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5B0204FD; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 13:18:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cP7QXzLWCL_C; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 13:18:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailout2.secunet.com (mailout2.secunet.com [62.96.220.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C18F9201E4; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 13:18:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cas-essen-01.secunet.de (unknown [10.53.40.201]) by mailout2.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC00D80004A; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 13:18:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) by cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.14; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 13:18:34 +0200 Received: from gauss2.secunet.de (10.182.7.193) by mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.14; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 13:18:34 +0200 Received: by gauss2.secunet.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C8E233183C2B; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 13:18:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 13:18:33 +0200 From: Steffen Klassert To: Nicolas Dichtel CC: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the ipsec tree Message-ID: <20210927111833.GH1407957@gauss3.secunet.de> References: <20210927064921.06973f44@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-ClientProxiedBy: cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) To mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 09:55:07AM +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > Le 26/09/2021 à 22:49, Stephen Rothwell a écrit : > > Hi all, > > > > In commit > > > > 93ec1320b017 ("xfrm: fix rcu lock in xfrm_notify_userpolicy()") > > > > Fixes tag > > > > Fixes: 703b94b93c19 ("xfrm: notify default policy on update") > > > > has these problem(s): > > > > - Target SHA1 does not exist > > > > Maybe you meant > > > > Fixes: 88d0adb5f13b ("xfrm: notify default policy on update") > > > In fact, the sha1 comes from the ipsec tree, which is regularly rebased. The testing branch of the ipsec tree might be rebased if I have a bad commit there. The master branch of the ipsec tree will not be rebased, as this branch is publicly used. > The original patch is only in this tree for now. > Steffen, maybe this fix could be squashed with the original commit? As said, I never rebased the master branch so far and would only do so in case of emergency.