From: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
To: <mst@redhat.com>, <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: <kernel@axis.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<pbonzini@redhat.com>, <stefanha@redhat.com>,
<sgarzare@redhat.com>,
Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 01/10] vhost: scsi: use copy_to_iter()
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:11:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210929151119.14778-2-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210929151119.14778-1-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
Use copy_to_iter() instead of __copy_to_user() when accessing the virtio
buffers as a preparation for supporting kernel-space buffers in vhost.
It also makes the code consistent since the driver is already using
copy_to_iter() in the other places it accesses the queued buffers.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
---
drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
index 532e204f2b1b..bcf53685439d 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ vhost_scsi_do_evt_work(struct vhost_scsi *vs, struct vhost_scsi_evt *evt)
{
struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &vs->vqs[VHOST_SCSI_VQ_EVT].vq;
struct virtio_scsi_event *event = &evt->event;
- struct virtio_scsi_event __user *eventp;
+ struct iov_iter iov_iter;
unsigned out, in;
int head, ret;
@@ -499,9 +499,10 @@ vhost_scsi_do_evt_work(struct vhost_scsi *vs, struct vhost_scsi_evt *evt)
vs->vs_events_missed = false;
}
- eventp = vq->iov[out].iov_base;
- ret = __copy_to_user(eventp, event, sizeof(*event));
- if (!ret)
+ iov_iter_init(&iov_iter, READ, &vq->iov[out], in, sizeof(*event));
+
+ ret = copy_to_iter(event, sizeof(*event), &iov_iter);
+ if (ret == sizeof(*event))
vhost_add_used_and_signal(&vs->dev, vq, head, 0);
else
vq_err(vq, "Faulted on vhost_scsi_send_event\n");
@@ -802,17 +803,18 @@ static void vhost_scsi_target_queue_cmd(struct vhost_scsi_cmd *cmd)
static void
vhost_scsi_send_bad_target(struct vhost_scsi *vs,
struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
- int head, unsigned out)
+ int head, unsigned out, unsigned in)
{
- struct virtio_scsi_cmd_resp __user *resp;
struct virtio_scsi_cmd_resp rsp;
+ struct iov_iter iov_iter;
int ret;
+ iov_iter_init(&iov_iter, READ, &vq->iov[out], in, sizeof(rsp));
+
memset(&rsp, 0, sizeof(rsp));
rsp.response = VIRTIO_SCSI_S_BAD_TARGET;
- resp = vq->iov[out].iov_base;
- ret = __copy_to_user(resp, &rsp, sizeof(rsp));
- if (!ret)
+ ret = copy_to_iter(&rsp, sizeof(rsp), &iov_iter);
+ if (ret == sizeof(rsp))
vhost_add_used_and_signal(&vs->dev, vq, head, 0);
else
pr_err("Faulted on virtio_scsi_cmd_resp\n");
@@ -1124,7 +1126,7 @@ vhost_scsi_handle_vq(struct vhost_scsi *vs, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
if (ret == -ENXIO)
break;
else if (ret == -EIO)
- vhost_scsi_send_bad_target(vs, vq, vc.head, vc.out);
+ vhost_scsi_send_bad_target(vs, vq, vc.head, vc.out, vc.in);
} while (likely(!vhost_exceeds_weight(vq, ++c, 0)));
out:
mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
@@ -1347,7 +1349,7 @@ vhost_scsi_ctl_handle_vq(struct vhost_scsi *vs, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
if (ret == -ENXIO)
break;
else if (ret == -EIO)
- vhost_scsi_send_bad_target(vs, vq, vc.head, vc.out);
+ vhost_scsi_send_bad_target(vs, vq, vc.head, vc.out, vc.in);
} while (likely(!vhost_exceeds_weight(vq, ++c, 0)));
out:
mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
--
2.28.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-29 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-29 15:11 [RFC PATCH 00/10] Support kernel buffers in vhost Vincent Whitchurch
2021-09-29 15:11 ` Vincent Whitchurch [this message]
2021-09-29 15:11 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] vhost: push virtqueue area pointers into a user struct Vincent Whitchurch
2021-09-29 15:11 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] vhost: add iov wrapper Vincent Whitchurch
2021-09-29 15:11 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] vhost: add support for kernel buffers Vincent Whitchurch
2021-09-29 15:11 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] vhost: extract common code for file_operations handling Vincent Whitchurch
2021-09-29 15:11 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] vhost: extract ioctl locking to common code Vincent Whitchurch
2021-09-29 15:11 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] vhost: add support for kernel control Vincent Whitchurch
2021-09-29 15:11 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] vhost: net: " Vincent Whitchurch
2021-09-29 15:11 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] vdpa: add test driver for kernel buffers in vhost Vincent Whitchurch
2021-09-29 15:11 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] selftests: add vhost_kernel tests Vincent Whitchurch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210929151119.14778-2-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com \
--to=vincent.whitchurch@axis.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel@axis.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®