From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1103C433F5 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:34:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBE86103D for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:34:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237169AbhJLPgU (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:36:20 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55810 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232642AbhJLPgI (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:36:08 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06B5F60EBB; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:34:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:34:04 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Heiko Carstens Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] s390: DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALL support Message-ID: <20211012113404.29ac7c9c@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20211012133802.2460757-1-hca@linux.ibm.com> <20211012094852.7f6a59b8@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:59:02 +0200 Heiko Carstens wrote: > One thing to note: Jiri adds a new a sample module, which obviously > will not compile for s390. Not sure if the config mechanism I propose > with this patch set is the best way to address this - it would then > require to add a config option for each new sample module. Is that really an issue? We could just group them, as long as they have the same prefix. HAVE_SAMPLE_FTRACE_DIRECT HAVE_SAMPLE_FTRACE_MULTI_DIRECT ?? -- Steve