mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Cc: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: buffer: Fix memory leak in iio_buffers_alloc_sysfs_and_mask()
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 10:27:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211021102737.5d54908a@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+U=DsorPFMpz3QS=dYrV4_UmeyeZXbS2Afpt7UHCkwo3JEABA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:41:10 +0300
Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 9:29 AM Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > When 'iio_dev_opaque->buffer_ioctl_handler' alloc fails in
> > iio_buffers_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(), the 'attrs' allocated in
> > iio_buffer_register_legacy_sysfs_groups() will be leaked:
> >
> > unreferenced object 0xffff888108568d00 (size 128):
> >   comm "88", pid 2014, jiffies 4294963294 (age 26.920s)
> >   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> >     80 3e da 02 80 88 ff ff 00 3a da 02 80 88 ff ff  .>.......:......
> >     00 35 da 02 80 88 ff ff 00 38 da 02 80 88 ff ff  .5.......8......
> >   backtrace:
> >     [<0000000095a9e51e>] __kmalloc+0x1a3/0x2f0
> >     [<00000000faa3735e>] iio_buffers_alloc_sysfs_and_mask+0xfa3/0x1480 [industrialio]
> >     [<00000000a46384dc>] __iio_device_register+0x52e/0x1b40 [industrialio]
> >     [<00000000210af05e>] __devm_iio_device_register+0x22/0x80 [industrialio]
> >     [<00000000730d7b41>] adjd_s311_probe+0x195/0x200 [adjd_s311]
> >     [<00000000c0f70eb9>] i2c_device_probe+0xa07/0xbb0
> >
> > The iio_buffer_register_legacy_sysfs_groups() is
> > called in __iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(),
> > so move the iio_buffer_unregister_legacy_sysfs_groups()
> > into __iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask(), then the memory
> > will be freed.
> >  
> 
> Reviewed- by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git.  Given where we are in the
cycle I'll probably shift these over to queue up for the merge window now.

Marked for stable as well.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> 
> > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> > Fixes: d9a625744ed0 ("iio: core: merge buffer/ & scan_elements/ attributes")
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> >   move iio_buffer_unregister_legacy_sysfs_groups() into
> >   __iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask()
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 12 +++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> > index a95cc2da56be..b29d105a75fe 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> > @@ -1583,8 +1583,12 @@ static int __iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> >         return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > -static void __iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_buffer *buffer)
> > +static void __iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> > +                                            struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > +                                            int index)
> >  {
> > +       if (index == 0)
> > +               iio_buffer_unregister_legacy_sysfs_groups(indio_dev);
> >         bitmap_free(buffer->scan_mask);
> >         kfree(buffer->buffer_group.name);
> >         kfree(buffer->buffer_group.attrs);
> > @@ -1638,7 +1642,7 @@ int iio_buffers_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> >  error_unwind_sysfs_and_mask:
> >         for (; unwind_idx >= 0; unwind_idx--) {
> >                 buffer = iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers[unwind_idx];
> > -               __iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask(buffer);
> > +               __iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask(buffer, indio_dev, unwind_idx);
> >         }
> >         return ret;
> >  }
> > @@ -1655,11 +1659,9 @@ void iio_buffers_free_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> >         iio_device_ioctl_handler_unregister(iio_dev_opaque->buffer_ioctl_handler);
> >         kfree(iio_dev_opaque->buffer_ioctl_handler);
> >
> > -       iio_buffer_unregister_legacy_sysfs_groups(indio_dev);
> > -
> >         for (i = iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers_cnt - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> >                 buffer = iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers[i];
> > -               __iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask(buffer);
> > +               __iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask(buffer, indio_dev, i);
> >         }
> >  }
> >
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >  


      reply	other threads:[~2021-10-21  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-18  6:37 Yang Yingliang
2021-10-18  6:41 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-10-21  9:27   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211021102737.5d54908a@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=ardeleanalex@gmail.com \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®