mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Shakeel Butt" <shakeelb@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] cgroup: no need for cgroup_mutex for /proc/cgroups
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 23:19:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211025061916.3853623-3-shakeelb@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211025061916.3853623-1-shakeelb@google.com>

On the real systems, the cgroups hierarchies are setup early and just
once by the node controller, so, other than number of cgroups, all
information in /proc/cgroups remain same for the system uptime. Let's
remove the cgroup_mutex usage on reading /proc/cgroups. There is a
chance of inconsistent number of cgroups for co-mounted cgroups while
printing the information from /proc/cgroups but that is not a big
issue. In addition /proc/cgroups is a v1 specific interface, so the
dependency on it should reduce over time.

The main motivation for removing the cgroup_mutex from /proc/cgroups is
to reduce the avenues of its contention. On our fleet, we have observed
buggy application hammering on /proc/cgroups and drastically slowing
down the node controller on the system which have many negative
consequences on other workloads running on the system.

Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
---
 kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c | 7 ++-----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
index fd14a60379c1..81c9e0685948 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
@@ -659,11 +659,9 @@ int proc_cgroupstats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 
 	seq_puts(m, "#subsys_name\thierarchy\tnum_cgroups\tenabled\n");
 	/*
-	 * ideally we don't want subsystems moving around while we do this.
-	 * cgroup_mutex is also necessary to guarantee an atomic snapshot of
-	 * subsys/hierarchy state.
+	 * Grab the subsystems state racily. No need to add avenue to
+	 * cgroup_mutex contention.
 	 */
-	mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
 
 	for_each_subsys(ss, i)
 		seq_printf(m, "%s\t%d\t%d\t%d\n",
@@ -671,7 +669,6 @@ int proc_cgroupstats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 			   atomic_read(&ss->root->nr_cgrps),
 			   cgroup_ssid_enabled(i));
 
-	mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.33.0.1079.g6e70778dc9-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-25  6:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-25  6:19 [PATCH 1/3] cgroup: reduce dependency on cgroup_mutex Shakeel Butt
2021-10-25  6:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] cgroup: remove cgroup_mutex from cgroupstats_build Shakeel Butt
2021-10-25  6:19 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2021-10-25 17:27   ` [PATCH 3/3] cgroup: no need for cgroup_mutex for /proc/cgroups Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211025061916.3853623-3-shakeelb@google.com \
    --to=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®