[PATCH 2/2] selftests/tc-testings: Be compatible with newer tc output

[Li Zhijian <zhijianx.li@intel.com>]

old tc(iproute2-5.9.0) output:
 action order 1: bpf action.o:[action-ok] id 60 tag bcf7977d3b93787c jited default-action pipe
newer tc(iproute2-5.14.0) output:
 action order 1: bpf action.o:[action-ok] id 64 name tag bcf7977d3b93787c jited default-action pipe

It can fix below errors:
 # ok 260 f84a - Add cBPF action with invalid bytecode
 # not ok 261 e939 - Add eBPF action with valid object-file
 #       Could not match regex pattern. Verify command output:
 # total acts 0
 #
 #       action order 1: bpf action.o:[action-ok] id 42 name  tag bcf7977d3b93787c jited default-action pipe
 #        index 667 ref 1 bind 0

Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <zhijianx.li@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json
index 503982b8f295..91832400ddbd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/actions/bpf.json
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
         "cmdUnderTest": "$TC action add action bpf object-file $EBPFDIR/action.o section action-ok index 667",
         "expExitCode": "0",
         "verifyCmd": "$TC action get action bpf index 667",
-        "matchPattern": "action order [0-9]*: bpf action.o:\\[action-ok\\] id [0-9]* tag [0-9a-f]{16}( jited)? default-action pipe.*index 667 ref",
+        "matchPattern": "action order [0-9]*: bpf action.o:\\[action-ok\\] id [0-9].* tag [0-9a-f]{16}( jited)? default-action pipe.*index 667 ref",
         "matchCount": "1",
         "teardown": [
             "$TC action flush action bpf"
-- 
2.32.0