From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C36AC433F5 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:38:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B3B761AF0 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:38:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232947AbhKSIlK (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Nov 2021 03:41:10 -0500 Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([62.96.220.36]:48748 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232265AbhKSIlJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Nov 2021 03:41:09 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9095201CF; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:38:06 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UoF3zvADTfgR; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:38:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailout2.secunet.com (mailout2.secunet.com [62.96.220.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70D442057B; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:38:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from cas-essen-01.secunet.de (unknown [10.53.40.201]) by mailout2.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61DFB80004A; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:38:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) by cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.14; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:38:06 +0100 Received: from gauss2.secunet.de (10.182.7.193) by mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.14; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:38:06 +0100 Received: by gauss2.secunet.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C95563180491; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:38:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:38:05 +0100 From: Steffen Klassert To: CC: Herbert Xu , "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , , , luo penghao , Zeal Robot Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] xfrm: Remove duplicate assignment Message-ID: <20211119083805.GN427717@gauss3.secunet.de> References: <20211104062621.2643-1-luo.penghao@zte.com.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211104062621.2643-1-luo.penghao@zte.com.cn> X-ClientProxiedBy: cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) To mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 06:26:21AM +0000, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote: > From: luo penghao > > The statement in the switch is repeated with the statement at the > beginning of the while loop, so this statement is meaningless. > > The clang_analyzer complains as follows: > > net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3392:2 warning: > > Value stored to 'exthdr' is never read > > Reported-by: Zeal Robot > Signed-off-by: luo penghao Applied to ipsec-next, thanks luo!