mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	bristot@redhat.com, Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Remove the cost of a redundant cpumask_next_wrap in select_idle_cpu
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 19:22:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211123112229.7812-1-21cnbao@gmail.com> (raw)

From: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>

This patch keeps the same scanning amount, but drops a redundant loop
of cpumask_next_wrap.
The original code did for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target + 1), then
checked --nr; this patch does --nr before doing the next loop, thus,
it can remove a cpumask_next_wrap() which costs a little bit.

Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index ff69f24..e2fb3e0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6298,9 +6298,9 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
 
 		span_avg = sd->span_weight * avg_idle;
 		if (span_avg > 4*avg_cost)
-			nr = div_u64(span_avg, avg_cost);
+			nr = div_u64(span_avg, avg_cost) - 1;
 		else
-			nr = 4;
+			nr = 3;
 
 		time = cpu_clock(this);
 	}
@@ -6312,11 +6312,11 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
 				return i;
 
 		} else {
-			if (!--nr)
-				return -1;
 			idle_cpu = __select_idle_cpu(cpu, p);
 			if ((unsigned int)idle_cpu < nr_cpumask_bits)
 				break;
+			if (!--nr)
+				return -1;
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
1.8.3.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-11-23 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-23 11:22 Barry Song [this message]
2021-11-23 21:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-24  0:07   ` Barry Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211123112229.7812-1-21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --to=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®