From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42271C433EF for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1349926AbhKXPBR (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2021 10:01:17 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33772 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229773AbhKXPBQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2021 10:01:16 -0500 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6536260C3F; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 09:58:03 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" Cc: LKML , RCU , "Paul E . McKenney" , Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton , Daniel Axtens , Frederic Weisbecker , Neeraj Upadhyay , Joel Fernandes , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , "Theodore Y . Ts'o" , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Oleksiy Avramchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] x86/mm: Switch to kvfree_rcu() API Message-ID: <20211124095803.2702bc89@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20211124110308.2053-6-urezki@gmail.com> References: <20211124110308.2053-1-urezki@gmail.com> <20211124110308.2053-6-urezki@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 12:03:04 +0100 "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" wrote: > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c b/arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c > index 933a2ebad471..e75137a06c32 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c > @@ -307,10 +307,8 @@ static void iounmap_trace_core(volatile void __iomem *addr) > > not_enabled: > spin_unlock_irq(&trace_lock); > - if (found_trace) { > - synchronize_rcu(); /* unregister_kmmio_probe() requirement */ > - kfree(found_trace); > - } > + if (found_trace) > + kvfree_rcu(found_trace); /* unregister_kmmio_probe() requirement */ > } > This is the first I've seen kvfree_rcu() (that I actually noticed/remember, I'm sure I probably was Cc'd on some patches). And I find the comment around it very confusing: Specifically: * kvfree_rcu(ptr); * * where @ptr is a pointer to kvfree(). The above suggests that you should pass a pointer to the actual function kvfree to kvfree_rcu(), which is not what I believe is to be done. i.e. kvfree_rcu(kvfree) ??? Perhaps rewrite that to say: * where @ptr is the pointer to be freed by kvfree(). ? Other than that, the patch looks fine to me. Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) -- Steve