mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
	mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Martin Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 06/18] rcu-tasks: Use spin_lock_rcu_node() and friends
Date: Wed,  1 Dec 2021 16:38:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211202003858.3129628-6-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211202003826.GA3129369@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>

This commit renames the rcu_tasks_percpu structure's ->cbs_pcpu_lock
to ->lock and then uses spin_lock_rcu_node() and friends to acquire and
release this lock, preparing for upcoming commits that will spread the
grace-period process across multiple CPUs and kthreads.

[ paulmck: Apply feedback from kernel test robot. ]

Reported-by: Martin Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
index 2e58d7fa2da41..e9f59a88637cf 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
@@ -23,11 +23,11 @@ typedef void (*postgp_func_t)(struct rcu_tasks *rtp);
 /**
  * struct rcu_tasks_percpu - Per-CPU component of definition for a Tasks-RCU-like mechanism.
  * @cblist: Callback list.
- * @cbs_pcpu_lock: Lock protecting per-CPU callback list.
+ * @lock: Lock protecting per-CPU callback list.
  */
 struct rcu_tasks_percpu {
 	struct rcu_segcblist cblist;
-	raw_spinlock_t cbs_pcpu_lock;
+	raw_spinlock_t __private lock;
 };
 
 /**
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ struct rcu_tasks {
 
 #define DEFINE_RCU_TASKS(rt_name, gp, call, n)						\
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_tasks_percpu, rt_name ## __percpu) = {			\
-	.cbs_pcpu_lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(rt_name ## __percpu.cbs_pcpu_lock),	\
+	.lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(rt_name ## __percpu.cbs_pcpu_lock),		\
 };											\
 static struct rcu_tasks rt_name =							\
 {											\
@@ -177,11 +177,11 @@ static void cblist_init_generic(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
 
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(!rtpcp);
 		if (cpu)
-			raw_spin_lock_init(&rtpcp->cbs_pcpu_lock);
-		raw_spin_lock(&rtpcp->cbs_pcpu_lock); // irqs already disabled.
+			raw_spin_lock_init(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(rtpcp, lock));
+		raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rtpcp); // irqs already disabled.
 		if (rcu_segcblist_empty(&rtpcp->cblist))
 			rcu_segcblist_init(&rtpcp->cblist);
-		raw_spin_unlock(&rtpcp->cbs_pcpu_lock); // irqs remain disabled.
+		raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rtpcp); // irqs remain disabled.
 	}
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtp->cbs_gbl_lock, flags);
 
@@ -200,15 +200,15 @@ static void call_rcu_tasks_generic(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t func,
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	rtpcp = per_cpu_ptr(rtp->rtpcpu,
 			    smp_processor_id() >> READ_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift));
-	raw_spin_lock(&rtpcp->cbs_pcpu_lock);
+	raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rtpcp); // irqs already disabled.
 	if (!rcu_segcblist_is_enabled(&rtpcp->cblist)) {
-		raw_spin_unlock(&rtpcp->cbs_pcpu_lock); // irqs remain disabled.
+		raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rtpcp); // irqs remain disabled.
 		cblist_init_generic(rtp);
-		raw_spin_lock(&rtpcp->cbs_pcpu_lock); // irqs already disabled.
+		raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rtpcp); // irqs already disabled.
 	}
 	needwake = rcu_segcblist_empty(&rtpcp->cblist);
 	rcu_segcblist_enqueue(&rtpcp->cblist, rhp);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtpcp->cbs_pcpu_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags);
 	/* We can't create the thread unless interrupts are enabled. */
 	if (needwake && READ_ONCE(rtp->kthread_ptr))
 		wake_up(&rtp->cbs_wq);
@@ -250,11 +250,11 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_tasks_kthread(void *arg)
 		set_tasks_gp_state(rtp, RTGS_WAIT_CBS);
 
 		/* Pick up any new callbacks. */
-		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtpcp->cbs_pcpu_lock, flags);
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags);
 		smp_mb__after_spinlock(); // Order updates vs. GP.
 		rcu_segcblist_advance(&rtpcp->cblist, rcu_seq_current(&rtp->tasks_gp_seq));
 		(void)rcu_segcblist_accelerate(&rtpcp->cblist, rcu_seq_snap(&rtp->tasks_gp_seq));
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtpcp->cbs_pcpu_lock, flags);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags);
 
 		/* If there were none, wait a bit and start over. */
 		if (!rcu_segcblist_pend_cbs(&rtpcp->cblist)) {
@@ -277,11 +277,11 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_tasks_kthread(void *arg)
 
 		/* Invoke the callbacks. */
 		set_tasks_gp_state(rtp, RTGS_INVOKE_CBS);
-		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtpcp->cbs_pcpu_lock, flags);
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags);
 		smp_mb__after_spinlock(); // Order updates vs. GP.
 		rcu_segcblist_advance(&rtpcp->cblist, rcu_seq_current(&rtp->tasks_gp_seq));
 		rcu_segcblist_extract_done_cbs(&rtpcp->cblist, &rcl);
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtpcp->cbs_pcpu_lock, flags);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags);
 		len = rcl.len;
 		for (rhp = rcu_cblist_dequeue(&rcl); rhp; rhp = rcu_cblist_dequeue(&rcl)) {
 			local_bh_disable();
@@ -289,10 +289,10 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_tasks_kthread(void *arg)
 			local_bh_enable();
 			cond_resched();
 		}
-		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtpcp->cbs_pcpu_lock, flags);
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags);
 		rcu_segcblist_add_len(&rtpcp->cblist, -len);
 		(void)rcu_segcblist_accelerate(&rtpcp->cblist, rcu_seq_snap(&rtp->tasks_gp_seq));
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtpcp->cbs_pcpu_lock, flags);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags);
 		/* Paranoid sleep to keep this from entering a tight loop */
 		schedule_timeout_idle(rtp->gp_sleep);
 	}
-- 
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-02  0:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-02  0:38 [PATCH rcu 0/18] RCU Tasks updates for v5.17 Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:38 ` [PATCH rcu 01/18] rcu-tasks: Don't remove tasks with pending IPIs from holdout list Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:38 ` [PATCH rcu 02/18] rcu-tasks: Create per-CPU callback lists Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:38 ` [PATCH rcu 03/18] rcu-tasks: Introduce ->percpu_enqueue_shift for dynamic queue selection Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:38 ` [PATCH rcu 04/18] rcu-tasks: Convert grace-period counter to grace-period sequence number Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:38 ` [PATCH rcu 05/18] rcu_tasks: Convert bespoke callback list to rcu_segcblist structure Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:38 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2021-12-02  0:38 ` [PATCH rcu 07/18] rcu-tasks: Inspect stalled task's trc state in locked state Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:38 ` [PATCH rcu 08/18] rcu-tasks: Add a ->percpu_enqueue_lim to the rcu_tasks structure Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:38 ` [PATCH rcu 09/18] rcu-tasks: Abstract checking of callback lists Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:38 ` [PATCH rcu 10/18] rcu-tasks: Abstract invocations of callbacks Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:38 ` [PATCH rcu 11/18] rcu-tasks: Use workqueues for multiple rcu_tasks_invoke_cbs() invocations Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:38 ` [PATCH rcu 12/18] rcu-tasks: Make rcu_barrier_tasks*() handle multiple callback queues Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:38 ` [PATCH rcu 13/18] rcu-tasks: Add rcupdate.rcu_task_enqueue_lim to set initial queueing Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:38 ` [PATCH rcu 14/18] rcu-tasks: Count trylocks to estimate call_rcu_tasks() contention Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:38 ` [PATCH rcu 15/18] rcu-tasks: Avoid raw-spinlocked wakeups from call_rcu_tasks_generic() Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:38 ` [PATCH rcu 16/18] rcu-tasks: Use more callback queues if contention encountered Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:38 ` [PATCH rcu 17/18] rcu-tasks: Use separate ->percpu_dequeue_lim for callback dequeueing Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-02  0:38 ` [PATCH rcu 18/18] rcu-tasks: Use fewer callbacks queues if callback flood ends Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211202003858.3129628-6-paulmck@kernel.org \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®