mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	ebiederm@xmission.com, oleg@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	x86@kernel.org, chang.seok.bae@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] signal: Skip the altstack update when not needed
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:55:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211210225503.12734-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com> (raw)

== Background ==

Support for large, "dynamic" fpstates was recently merged.  This
included code to ensure that sigaltstacks are sufficiently sized for
these large states.  A new lock was added to remove races between
enabling large features and setting up sigaltstacks.

== Problem ==

The new lock (sigaltstack_lock()) is acquired in the sigreturn path
before restoring the old sigaltstack.  Unfortunately, contention on the
new lock causes a measurable signal handling performance regression [1].
However, the common case is that no *changes* are made to the
sigaltstack state at sigreturn.

== Solution ==

do_sigaltstack() acquires sigaltstack_lock() and is used for both
sys_sigaltstack() and restoring the sigaltstack in sys_sigreturn().
Check for changes to the sigaltstack before taking the lock.  If no
changes were made, return before acquiring the lock.

This removes lock contention from the common-case sigreturn path.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211207012128.GA16074@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/
Fixes: 3aac3ebea08f ("x86/signal: Implement sigaltstack size validation")
Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
---
Changes from v1:
* Rewrite the changelog. (Dave Hansen)
* Add the code comment. (Dave Hansen)
---
 kernel/signal.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index a629b11bf3e0..dfcee3888b00 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -4185,6 +4185,15 @@ do_sigaltstack (const stack_t *ss, stack_t *oss, unsigned long sp,
 				ss_mode != 0))
 			return -EINVAL;
 
+		/*
+		 * Return before taking any locks if no actual
+		 * sigaltstack changes were requested.
+		 */
+		if (t->sas_ss_sp == (unsigned long)ss_sp &&
+		    t->sas_ss_size == ss_size &&
+		    t->sas_ss_flags == ss_flags)
+			return 0;
+
 		sigaltstack_lock();
 		if (ss_mode == SS_DISABLE) {
 			ss_size = 0;
-- 
2.17.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-12-10 23:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-10 22:55 Chang S. Bae [this message]
2021-12-13 21:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-14  1:01   ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-12-14 21:12 ` [tip: sched/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Chang S. Bae

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211210225503.12734-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®