mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	rafael@kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: intel_epb: Allow model specific normal EPB value
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 08:33:27 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211211163327.3093169-1-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> (raw)

The current EPB "normal" is defined as 6 and set whenever power-up EPB
value is 0. This setting resulted in the desired out of box power and
performance for several CPU generations. But this value is not suitable
for AlderLake mobile CPUs, as this resulted in higher uncore power.
Since EPB is model specific, this is not unreasonable to have different
behavior.

Allow a capability where "normal" EPB can be redefined. For AlderLake
mobile CPUs this desired normal value is 7.

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_epb.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_epb.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_epb.c
index f4dd73396f28..fbaf12e43f41 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_epb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_epb.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
 #include <linux/pm.h>
 
+#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
 #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
 #include <asm/msr.h>
 
@@ -58,6 +59,22 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u8, saved_epb);
 #define EPB_SAVED	0x10ULL
 #define MAX_EPB		EPB_MASK
 
+enum energy_perf_value_index {
+	EPB_INDEX_PERFORMANCE,
+	EPB_INDEX_BALANCE_PERFORMANCE,
+	EPB_INDEX_NORMAL,
+	EPB_INDEX_BALANCE_POWERSAVE,
+	EPB_INDEX_POWERSAVE,
+};
+
+static u8 energ_perf_values[] = {
+	[EPB_INDEX_PERFORMANCE] = ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_PERFORMANCE,
+	[EPB_INDEX_BALANCE_PERFORMANCE] = ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_BALANCE_PERFORMANCE,
+	[EPB_INDEX_NORMAL] = ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_NORMAL,
+	[EPB_INDEX_BALANCE_POWERSAVE] = ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_BALANCE_POWERSAVE,
+	[EPB_INDEX_POWERSAVE] = ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_POWERSAVE,
+};
+
 static int intel_epb_save(void)
 {
 	u64 epb;
@@ -90,7 +107,7 @@ static void intel_epb_restore(void)
 		 */
 		val = epb & EPB_MASK;
 		if (val == ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_PERFORMANCE) {
-			val = ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_NORMAL;
+			val = energ_perf_values[EPB_INDEX_NORMAL];
 			pr_warn_once("ENERGY_PERF_BIAS: Set to 'normal', was 'performance'\n");
 		}
 	}
@@ -103,18 +120,11 @@ static struct syscore_ops intel_epb_syscore_ops = {
 };
 
 static const char * const energy_perf_strings[] = {
-	"performance",
-	"balance-performance",
-	"normal",
-	"balance-power",
-	"power"
-};
-static const u8 energ_perf_values[] = {
-	ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_PERFORMANCE,
-	ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_BALANCE_PERFORMANCE,
-	ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_NORMAL,
-	ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_BALANCE_POWERSAVE,
-	ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_POWERSAVE
+	[EPB_INDEX_PERFORMANCE] = "performance",
+	[EPB_INDEX_BALANCE_PERFORMANCE] = "balance-performance",
+	[EPB_INDEX_NORMAL] = "normal",
+	[EPB_INDEX_BALANCE_POWERSAVE] = "balance-power",
+	[EPB_INDEX_POWERSAVE] = "power",
 };
 
 static ssize_t energy_perf_bias_show(struct device *dev,
@@ -193,13 +203,22 @@ static int intel_epb_offline(unsigned int cpu)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_epb_normal[] = {
+	X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE_L, 7),
+	{}
+};
+
 static __init int intel_epb_init(void)
 {
+	const struct x86_cpu_id *id = x86_match_cpu(intel_epb_normal);
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_EPB))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
+	if (id)
+		energ_perf_values[EPB_INDEX_NORMAL] = id->driver_data;
+
 	ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_X86_INTEL_EPB_ONLINE,
 				"x86/intel/epb:online", intel_epb_online,
 				intel_epb_offline);
-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-12-11 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-11 16:33 Srinivas Pandruvada [this message]
2021-12-13 10:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-01-04 15:26   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211211163327.3093169-1-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --to=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®