From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64: Support dynamic preemption v3
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 15:07:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211220140726.GB918551@lothringen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXEBWJVGtRVKRkxeJc5bj4Cbb9oA_67PyJDYhTwiaHc7jA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 03:03:36PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Hello Frederic,
>
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 15:01, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I haven't seen much comments on the static key based version from Mark
> > so I don't know which direction we'll eventually take. I still hope we
> > can focus on a unified static call based implementation, considering
> > there are other users waiting on arm64 static calls.
> >
>
> Which other users are you referring to here?
I believe Android was interested in it?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-20 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-20 14:01 Frederic Weisbecker
2021-12-20 14:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] static_call: Use non-function types to refer to the trampolines Frederic Weisbecker
2021-12-20 14:01 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm64: implement support for static call trampolines Frederic Weisbecker
2021-12-20 14:01 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/preempt: Prepare for supporting !CONFIG_GENERIC_ENTRY dynamic preemption Frederic Weisbecker
2021-12-20 14:01 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm64: Implement IRQ exit preemption static call for " Frederic Weisbecker
2021-12-20 14:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm64: Implement HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Frederic Weisbecker
2021-12-20 14:03 ` [GIT PULL] arm64: Support dynamic preemption v3 Ard Biesheuvel
2021-12-20 14:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2021-12-20 14:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-01-04 17:08 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211220140726.GB918551@lothringen \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®