From: <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To: <mani@kernel.org>, <Mmturquette@baylibre.com>, <sboyd@kernel.org>,
<linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>,
<mail@conchuod.ie>, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Subject: [PATCH] clk: bm1880: remove kfrees on static allocations
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 15:42:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211223154244.1024062-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com> (raw)
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
bm1880_clk_unregister_pll & bm1880_clk_unregister_div both try to
free statically allocated variables, so remove those kfrees.
For example, if we take L703 kfree(div_hw):
- div_hw is a bm1880_div_hw_clock pointer
- in bm1880_clk_register_plls this is pointed to an element of arg1:
struct bm1880_div_hw_clock *clks
- in the probe, where bm1880_clk_register_plls is called arg1 is
bm1880_div_clks, defined on L371:
static struct bm1880_div_hw_clock bm1880_div_clks[]
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
---
drivers/clk/clk-bm1880.c | 20 ++------------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-bm1880.c b/drivers/clk/clk-bm1880.c
index e6d6599d310a..fad78a22218e 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-bm1880.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-bm1880.c
@@ -522,14 +522,6 @@ static struct clk_hw *bm1880_clk_register_pll(struct bm1880_pll_hw_clock *pll_cl
return hw;
}
-static void bm1880_clk_unregister_pll(struct clk_hw *hw)
-{
- struct bm1880_pll_hw_clock *pll_hw = to_bm1880_pll_clk(hw);
-
- clk_hw_unregister(hw);
- kfree(pll_hw);
-}
-
static int bm1880_clk_register_plls(struct bm1880_pll_hw_clock *clks,
int num_clks,
struct bm1880_clock_data *data)
@@ -555,7 +547,7 @@ static int bm1880_clk_register_plls(struct bm1880_pll_hw_clock *clks,
err_clk:
while (i--)
- bm1880_clk_unregister_pll(data->hw_data.hws[clks[i].pll.id]);
+ clk_hw_unregister(data->hw_data.hws[clks[i].pll.id]);
return PTR_ERR(hw);
}
@@ -695,14 +687,6 @@ static struct clk_hw *bm1880_clk_register_div(struct bm1880_div_hw_clock *div_cl
return hw;
}
-static void bm1880_clk_unregister_div(struct clk_hw *hw)
-{
- struct bm1880_div_hw_clock *div_hw = to_bm1880_div_clk(hw);
-
- clk_hw_unregister(hw);
- kfree(div_hw);
-}
-
static int bm1880_clk_register_divs(struct bm1880_div_hw_clock *clks,
int num_clks,
struct bm1880_clock_data *data)
@@ -729,7 +713,7 @@ static int bm1880_clk_register_divs(struct bm1880_div_hw_clock *clks,
err_clk:
while (i--)
- bm1880_clk_unregister_div(data->hw_data.hws[clks[i].div.id]);
+ clk_hw_unregister(data->hw_data.hws[clks[i].div.id]);
return PTR_ERR(hw);
}
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-12-23 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-23 15:42 conor.dooley [this message]
2022-01-07 1:46 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211223154244.1024062-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--to=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=Mmturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=daire.mcnamara@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mail@conchuod.ie \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®