From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3F4C433FE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2022 09:32:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234044AbiAHJcw (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jan 2022 04:32:52 -0500 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:22393 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231347AbiAHJcv (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jan 2022 04:32:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1641634371; x=1673170371; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=TWEkWPHLX2IJoddB7iNldtAD+V2GysZca6V/7YMEAWY=; b=B7teS4sWT3eng3xxGtT6k/O1X2g7jx/dZ0Xdq83FjJqMzvNjwNnaJinN Udy35vwp2Q+lotQBCnl5xTnb2BNxTJg+q8VEh98VGAJ+2a84Sr3BSpscl gPr/pY/rstWu9moEwfjGcpwAQ11Qwx+4UqiupZYTNTcXZ0vZZ++FZVeaE pkhuaxQjt4zp8mBq5tC7AMX9omCI/SdZweG3T/MLplLIkiVc4w19Sem+8 7cBv7EInMInj2MgAndtZpndTETh7fr1uCgkOlU4p/+78e9qnAQP25H5Ci CZ9Sp6LSgWloG/85uhQVINB6f2PRXPIWYoQNAwNbzByHwtfFHKkzmxD2Q A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10220"; a="222989086" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,272,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="222989086" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Jan 2022 01:32:51 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,272,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="622190250" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 276f1b88eecb) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2022 01:32:50 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 276f1b88eecb with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n685h-0000TH-F2; Sat, 08 Jan 2022 09:32:49 +0000 Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 17:32:01 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Minchan Kim Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: [rt-devel:linux-5.16.y-rt-rebase 102/127] kernel/locking/spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested'; did you mean '_raw_write_lock_nested'? Message-ID: <202201081743.6XKFffqI-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git linux-5.16.y-rt-rebase head: a6be65cb880860db356744acca5d49bf43ac0e94 commit: a80864a2a62f4fc6fd4061092d0996ef870d7a9d [102/127] locking/rwlocks: introduce write_lock_nested config: sparc64-randconfig-p002-20220107 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220108/202201081743.6XKFffqI-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git/commit/?id=a80864a2a62f4fc6fd4061092d0996ef870d7a9d git remote add rt-devel https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git git fetch --no-tags rt-devel linux-5.16.y-rt-rebase git checkout a80864a2a62f4fc6fd4061092d0996ef870d7a9d # save the config file to linux build tree mkdir build_dir COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=sparc64 SHELL=/bin/bash If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/locking/spinlock.c:68:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_spin_lock' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 68 | void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock(locktype##_t *lock) \ | ^~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:126:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS' 126 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(spin, raw_spinlock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:80:26: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_spin_lock_irqsave' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 80 | unsigned long __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_irqsave(locktype##_t *lock) \ | ^~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:126:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS' 126 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(spin, raw_spinlock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:98:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_spin_lock_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 98 | void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_irq(locktype##_t *lock) \ | ^~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:126:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS' 126 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(spin, raw_spinlock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:103:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_spin_lock_bh' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 103 | void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_bh(locktype##_t *lock) \ | ^~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:126:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS' 126 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(spin, raw_spinlock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:68:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_read_lock' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 68 | void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock(locktype##_t *lock) \ | ^~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:129:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS' 129 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(read, rwlock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:80:26: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_read_lock_irqsave' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 80 | unsigned long __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_irqsave(locktype##_t *lock) \ | ^~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:129:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS' 129 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(read, rwlock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:98:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_read_lock_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 98 | void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_irq(locktype##_t *lock) \ | ^~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:129:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS' 129 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(read, rwlock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:103:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_read_lock_bh' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 103 | void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_bh(locktype##_t *lock) \ | ^~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:129:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS' 129 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(read, rwlock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:68:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_write_lock' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 68 | void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock(locktype##_t *lock) \ | ^~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:130:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS' 130 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(write, rwlock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:80:26: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_write_lock_irqsave' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 80 | unsigned long __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_irqsave(locktype##_t *lock) \ | ^~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:130:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS' 130 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(write, rwlock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:98:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_write_lock_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 98 | void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_irq(locktype##_t *lock) \ | ^~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:130:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS' 130 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(write, rwlock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:103:17: warning: no previous prototype for '__raw_write_lock_bh' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 103 | void __lockfunc __raw_##op##_lock_bh(locktype##_t *lock) \ | ^~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c:130:1: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_LOCK_OPS' 130 | BUILD_LOCK_OPS(write, rwlock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/locking/spinlock.c: In function '_raw_write_lock_nested': >> kernel/locking/spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested'; did you mean '_raw_write_lock_nested'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 306 | __raw_write_lock_nested(lock, subclass); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | _raw_write_lock_nested cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +306 kernel/locking/spinlock.c 303 304 void __lockfunc _raw_write_lock_nested(rwlock_t *lock, int subclass) 305 { > 306 __raw_write_lock_nested(lock, subclass); 307 } 308 EXPORT_SYMBOL(_raw_write_lock_nested); 309 #endif 310 --- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org