From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
tytso@mit.edu, Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ext4: Fix error handling in ext4_restore_inline_data()
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 11:58:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220113105820.dzusr7ytt6ih3okw@quack3.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e10d89e0184f47ccf9093f50276c2e188c19fd3f.1642044249.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu 13-01-22 08:56:24, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> While running "./check -I 200 generic/475" it sometimes gives below
> kernel BUG(). Ideally we should not call ext4_write_inline_data() if
> ext4_create_inline_data() has failed.
>
> <log snip>
> [73131.453234] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inline.c:223!
>
> <code snip>
> 212 static void ext4_write_inline_data(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_iloc *iloc,
> 213 void *buffer, loff_t pos, unsigned int len)
> 214 {
> <...>
> 223 BUG_ON(!EXT4_I(inode)->i_inline_off);
> 224 BUG_ON(pos + len > EXT4_I(inode)->i_inline_size);
>
> This patch handles the error and prints out a emergency msg saying potential
> data loss for the given inode (since we couldn't restore the original
> inline_data due to some previous error).
>
> [ 9571.070313] EXT4-fs (dm-0): error restoring inline_data for inode -- potential data loss! (inode 1703982, error -30)
>
> Reported-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Makes sence. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/inline.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inline.c b/fs/ext4/inline.c
> index 534c0329e110..31741e8a462e 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inline.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inline.c
> @@ -1135,7 +1135,15 @@ static void ext4_restore_inline_data(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> struct ext4_iloc *iloc,
> void *buf, int inline_size)
> {
> - ext4_create_inline_data(handle, inode, inline_size);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = ext4_create_inline_data(handle, inode, inline_size);
> + if (ret) {
> + ext4_msg(inode->i_sb, KERN_EMERG,
> + "error restoring inline_data for inode -- potential data loss! (inode %lu, error %d)",
> + inode->i_ino, ret);
> + return;
> + }
> ext4_write_inline_data(inode, iloc, buf, 0, inline_size);
> ext4_set_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA);
> }
> --
> 2.31.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-13 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-13 3:26 [PATCH 0/6] ext4/jbd2: inline_data fixes and some cleanups Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-13 3:26 ` [PATCH 1/6] ext4: Fix error handling in ext4_restore_inline_data() Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-13 10:58 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2022-01-13 3:26 ` [PATCH 2/6] ext4: Remove redundant max inline_size check in ext4_da_write_inline_data_begin() Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-13 10:58 ` Jan Kara
2022-01-13 3:26 ` [PATCH 3/6] ext4: Fix error handling in ext4_fc_record_modified_inode() Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-13 11:00 ` Jan Kara
2022-01-13 3:26 ` [PATCH 4/6] jbd2: Cleanup unused functions declarations from jbd2.h Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-13 11:01 ` Jan Kara
2022-01-13 3:26 ` [PATCH 5/6] jbd2: Refactor wait logic for transaction updates into a common function Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-13 11:30 ` Jan Kara
2022-01-13 12:17 ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-13 3:26 ` [PATCH 6/6] jbd2: No need to use t_handle_lock in jbd2_journal_wait_updates Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-13 11:27 ` Jan Kara
2022-01-13 12:38 ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-17 12:55 ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-01-17 14:38 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220113105820.dzusr7ytt6ih3okw@quack3.lan \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=enwlinux@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome