From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
jkosina@suse.cz, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
mgurtovoy@nvidia.com, linux@weissschuh.net,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
stephan@gerhold.net, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Convert type of 'struct dmi_system_id -> driver_data' from 'void *' to kernel_ulong_t?
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 14:27:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220119202749.GA959272@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa51355f-9ab6-7bbf-d7f6-e2af2d68056c@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 11:20:36AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 1/19/22 02:22, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> > I wonder if there's any reason to use 'void *' instead of
> > kernel_ulong_t for 'driver_data' in 'struct dmi_system_id'?
> >
> > I'd like to use the driver_data for applying quirk flags, and I found
> > out unlike most other struct *_id, the dmi variant is using 'void *'
> > for driver_data. Is there any technical reason for this?
> > ...
> You are asking for a technical reason why "void *" was used,
> but lets turn that around, why do you believe that "unsigned long"
> is inherently a better type here ?
>
> driver_data in most places in the kernel (like data for
> all sort of callback functions) actually typically is a void *
> already, because often people want to pass more data then what
> fits in a single long and this also applies to driver-id attached
> data.
FWIW, "egrep "context;|data;|info;" include/linux/mod_devicetable.h"
says 4 of the ~40 instances use a void *; the others use
kernel_ulong_t.
f45d069a5628 ("PCI dynids - documentation fixes, id_table NULL check")
[1] (from the tglx history tree) added the original hint for
pci_device_id that:
Best practice for use of driver_data is to use it as an index into a
static list of equivalant device types, not to use it as a pointer.
I don't know the background of that, but I could imagine that using an
index rather than a pointer makes things like /sys/bus/pci/.../new_id
easier and safer.
Bjorn
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/commit/?id=f45d069a5628
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-19 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-19 1:22 Kai-Heng Feng
2022-01-19 10:20 ` Hans de Goede
2022-01-19 20:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2022-01-19 20:45 ` Hans de Goede
2022-01-20 1:14 ` Kai-Heng Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220119202749.GA959272@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome