mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: frederic@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: When rcuog kthreads is in polling mode, wakeup waitqueue is not requried
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 21:17:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220129051748.GP4285@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220128031346.157961-1-qiang1.zhang@intel.com>

On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 11:13:46AM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
> When grace period cleanup, the rcuog kthreads that waiting in sq
> waitqueue will be awakened, however if the 'rcu_nocb_poll' is set,
> the sq waitqueue always empty, so if 'rcu_nocb_poll' is set, return
> directly.

This does decrease grace-period-cleanup overhead in kernels built with
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=y and booted with the rcu_nocb_poll kernel boot
parameter set.  On the other hand, it increases grace-period-cleanup
overhead in kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=y but booted without
the rcu_nocb_poll kernel boot parameter set.

Last I checked, more kernels were booted without the rcu_nocb_poll kernel
boot parameter set.  If this is still the case, this patch would slow
things down for most systems.

Or are there now lots of systems booted with rcu_nocb_poll?

							Thanx, Paul

> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> index 636d0546a4e9..9e106c590e56 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> @@ -201,6 +201,8 @@ static void rcu_lockdep_assert_cblist_protected(struct rcu_data *rdp)
>   */
>  static void rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct swait_queue_head *sq)
>  {
> +	if (rcu_nocb_poll)
> +		return;
>  	swake_up_all(sq);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-29  5:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-28  3:13 Zqiang
2022-01-29  5:17 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2022-01-29  5:55   ` Zhang, Qiang1
2022-01-29 16:37     ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-01-30  2:18       ` Zhang, Qiang1

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220129051748.GP4285@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1 \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang1.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®