From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: frederic@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: When rcuog kthreads is in polling mode, wakeup waitqueue is not requried
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 21:17:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220129051748.GP4285@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220128031346.157961-1-qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 11:13:46AM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
> When grace period cleanup, the rcuog kthreads that waiting in sq
> waitqueue will be awakened, however if the 'rcu_nocb_poll' is set,
> the sq waitqueue always empty, so if 'rcu_nocb_poll' is set, return
> directly.
This does decrease grace-period-cleanup overhead in kernels built with
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=y and booted with the rcu_nocb_poll kernel boot
parameter set. On the other hand, it increases grace-period-cleanup
overhead in kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=y but booted without
the rcu_nocb_poll kernel boot parameter set.
Last I checked, more kernels were booted without the rcu_nocb_poll kernel
boot parameter set. If this is still the case, this patch would slow
things down for most systems.
Or are there now lots of systems booted with rcu_nocb_poll?
Thanx, Paul
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> index 636d0546a4e9..9e106c590e56 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> @@ -201,6 +201,8 @@ static void rcu_lockdep_assert_cblist_protected(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> */
> static void rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct swait_queue_head *sq)
> {
> + if (rcu_nocb_poll)
> + return;
> swake_up_all(sq);
> }
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-29 5:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-28 3:13 Zqiang
2022-01-29 5:17 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2022-01-29 5:55 ` Zhang, Qiang1
2022-01-29 16:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-01-30 2:18 ` Zhang, Qiang1
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220129051748.GP4285@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1 \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qiang1.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®