From: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org (open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA
GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS),
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org (open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA
GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS)
Subject: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/mmu: fix reuse of nvkm_umem
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 17:14:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220207161443.1843660-1-kherbst@redhat.com> (raw)
I am not entirely sure if this fixes anything, but the code standed out
while investigated problematic calls to vunmap.
nvkm_umem.io is only ever set for the NVKM_OBJECT_MAP_IO case in
nvkm_umem_map, but never for the NVKM_OBJECT_MAP_VA one, which could lead
to taking the wrong patch inside nvkm_umem_unmap.
I just don't know if this is a real issue or not, but the code doesn't
look correct this way.
Fixes: c83c4097eba8 ("drm/nouveau/mmu: define user interfaces to mmu memory allocation")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.15+
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/umem.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/umem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/umem.c
index e530bb8b3b17..2608e0796066 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/umem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/umem.c
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ nvkm_umem_map(struct nvkm_object *object, void *argv, u32 argc,
*handle = (unsigned long)(void *)umem->map;
*length = nvkm_memory_size(umem->memory);
*type = NVKM_OBJECT_MAP_VA;
+ umem->io = false;
return 0;
} else
if ((umem->type & NVKM_MEM_VRAM) ||
@@ -112,12 +113,11 @@ nvkm_umem_map(struct nvkm_object *object, void *argv, u32 argc,
return ret;
*type = NVKM_OBJECT_MAP_IO;
- } else {
- return -EINVAL;
+ umem->io = true;
+ return 0;
}
- umem->io = (*type == NVKM_OBJECT_MAP_IO);
- return 0;
+ return -EINVAL;
}
static void *
--
2.34.1
reply other threads:[~2022-02-07 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220207161443.1843660-1-kherbst@redhat.com \
--to=kherbst@redhat.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®