From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3517C433EF for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 19:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1343944AbiBJT0I (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:26:08 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:59496 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234293AbiBJT0G (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:26:06 -0500 Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A845BED for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:26:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1644521167; x=1676057167; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=gX3EHuEY3grbC3ebvrtPPRZIZDZO1U8MbJmtFmFU9ng=; b=MBsSLmbKdeQlUKOlRFmWIVVgqIaHMzchSWSGEuBo/sqihZ+H1iU7oIPj tYWXN4UZJDnml+ZzcWZTceVi2OJM5EmHWNGbpjzSnk7qskeegjXzWKpCS YkBQGLzqIBYepc7lCKihkvj2k1Cyj4ctDRwCGznkMqkRnKPm3XwPDJy9e 2LmHBnb056wa19gQZeuBAUpRxSFdFUHMciv8ed7/wI80o3eQb+OCxfaQE Ypa6UsGpnL8F5z94ObLRzgbrqhMioXbJrkjohZ4sXbePdnv/vV8PEB5lK s1IQxYWhLvxMLbQZtyHmq47rBd80yzf4xqQAGrueyXvyjaQuY2ITOT0qD w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10254"; a="233132840" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,359,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="233132840" Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Feb 2022 11:26:07 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,359,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="602144820" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO d95dc2dabeb1) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Feb 2022 11:26:05 -0800 Received: from kbuild by d95dc2dabeb1 with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nIF4u-0003fh-Mn; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 19:26:04 +0000 Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 03:25:34 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Wei Fu Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guo Ren , Liu Shaohua , Heiko Stuebner Subject: [csky-linux:riscv_compat_v6_svpbmt-v6 12/35] WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x8dc): Section mismatch in reference from the function riscv_cpufeature_patch_func() to the function .init.text:cpufeature_probe() Message-ID: <202202110359.05keld0L-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org tree: https://github.com/c-sky/csky-linux riscv_compat_v6_svpbmt-v6 head: 54acb36c958fc990cc59889f79c8ddca7386c295 commit: bac41a3372f9586652716665df9da6c4059b9309 [12/35] riscv: add RISC-V Svpbmt extension support config: riscv-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220211/202202110359.05keld0L-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/c-sky/csky-linux/commit/bac41a3372f9586652716665df9da6c4059b9309 git remote add csky-linux https://github.com/c-sky/csky-linux git fetch --no-tags csky-linux riscv_compat_v6_svpbmt-v6 git checkout bac41a3372f9586652716665df9da6c4059b9309 # save the config file to linux build tree mkdir build_dir COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=riscv SHELL=/bin/bash If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<): >> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x8dc): Section mismatch in reference from the function riscv_cpufeature_patch_func() to the function .init.text:cpufeature_probe() The function riscv_cpufeature_patch_func() references the function __init cpufeature_probe(). This is often because riscv_cpufeature_patch_func lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of cpufeature_probe is wrong. --- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org