From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C2CC433F5 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 20:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1353397AbiBKUog (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 15:44:36 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:41462 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232014AbiBKUof (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 15:44:35 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5F821A2 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:44:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1644612273; x=1676148273; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ooP7Nd9GepcPUnJpgnBJPD3s6gNZ7UwYLT/WQ+DKCcM=; b=gBBykbgumlZMgNF3vNiOf3TOlncxzV3e/BmqWwJcPRvthhQnHQ+VPJCv j6P3udDW7BtoPDOP02JwaEid21jQoJT8FXuTuTOCeF4zvFUyRiGp1O7uh RUhlTVtF1vWXa9QJKiWtslq0Sqxl+nVCNQkVvfnLY51ljy0YDEIgBLC0y P7uv9QZ1QF0aWnVMHDLomPxj0nUntOqmcqWwcEB6my2Mm/4KYNNs8MYMZ FsNY+Rt0lcUO844PDm81ujDKqW+ErGRhT7wLW3fGprmSYug4O2wK/dy5w mL0HurdUjcQnNcs0zL+mEmyH1tuTVdQonL/T1h0U2sM9xkyPFiaia4ea+ A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10255"; a="237211909" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,361,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="237211909" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Feb 2022 12:44:33 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,361,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="527093527" Received: from iweiny-desk2.sc.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.3.52.147]) by orsmga007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Feb 2022 12:44:33 -0800 Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:44:33 -0800 From: Ira Weiny To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" Cc: "hpa@zytor.com" , "Williams, Dan J" , "dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" , "Yu, Fenghua" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 30/44] mm/pkeys: Test setting a PKS key in a custom fault callback Message-ID: <20220211204433.GT785175@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> References: <20220127175505.851391-1-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20220127175505.851391-31-ira.weiny@intel.com> <9ef3dff3f46edda07afdf6b2469ef9a1a606563e.camel@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9ef3dff3f46edda07afdf6b2469ef9a1a606563e.camel@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 09:42:32AM -0800, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote: > On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 09:54 -0800, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote: > > +#define RUN_FAULT_ABANDON 5 > > The tests still call this operation "abandon" all throughout, but the > operation got renamed in the kernel. Probably should rename it in the > tests too. Thanks... I thought I had changed all the names. Missed that one. s/RUN_FAULT_ABANDON/RUN_FAULT_CALLBACK Ira