mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Eric Hankland <ehankland@google.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86/pmu: Extract check_pmu_event_filter() from the same semantics
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:36:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220217083601.24829-1-likexu@tencent.com> (raw)

From: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>

Checking the kvm->arch.pmu_event_filter policy in both gp and fixed
code paths was somewhat redundant, so common parts can be extracted,
which reduces code footprint, improves readability and facilitates
the maintenance of SRCU logic for pmu_event_filter in a one place.

Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index f614f95acc6b..af2a3dd22dd9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -179,12 +179,42 @@ static int cmp_u64(const void *a, const void *b)
 	return *(__u64 *)a - *(__u64 *)b;
 }
 
+static bool check_pmu_event_filter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
+{
+	struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *filter;
+	struct kvm *kvm = pmc->vcpu->kvm;
+	bool allow_event = true;
+	__u64 key;
+	int idx;
+
+	filter = srcu_dereference(kvm->arch.pmu_event_filter, &kvm->srcu);
+	if (!filter)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (pmc_is_gp(pmc)) {
+		key = pmc->eventsel & AMD64_RAW_EVENT_MASK_NB;
+		if (bsearch(&key, filter->events, filter->nevents,
+			    sizeof(__u64), cmp_u64))
+			allow_event = filter->action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW;
+		else
+			allow_event = filter->action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY;
+	} else {
+		idx = pmc->idx - INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED;
+		if (filter->action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY &&
+		    test_bit(idx, (ulong *)&filter->fixed_counter_bitmap))
+			allow_event = false;
+		if (filter->action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW &&
+		    !test_bit(idx, (ulong *)&filter->fixed_counter_bitmap))
+			allow_event = false;
+	}
+
+out:
+	return allow_event;
+}
+
 void reprogram_gp_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u64 eventsel)
 {
 	unsigned config, type = PERF_TYPE_RAW;
-	struct kvm *kvm = pmc->vcpu->kvm;
-	struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *filter;
-	bool allow_event = true;
 
 	if (eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_PIN_CONTROL)
 		printk_once("kvm pmu: pin control bit is ignored\n");
@@ -196,17 +226,7 @@ void reprogram_gp_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u64 eventsel)
 	if (!(eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE) || !pmc_is_enabled(pmc))
 		return;
 
-	filter = srcu_dereference(kvm->arch.pmu_event_filter, &kvm->srcu);
-	if (filter) {
-		__u64 key = eventsel & AMD64_RAW_EVENT_MASK_NB;
-
-		if (bsearch(&key, filter->events, filter->nevents,
-			    sizeof(__u64), cmp_u64))
-			allow_event = filter->action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW;
-		else
-			allow_event = filter->action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY;
-	}
-	if (!allow_event)
+	if (!check_pmu_event_filter(pmc))
 		return;
 
 	if (!(eventsel & (ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EDGE |
@@ -241,23 +261,14 @@ void reprogram_fixed_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u8 ctrl, int idx)
 {
 	unsigned en_field = ctrl & 0x3;
 	bool pmi = ctrl & 0x8;
-	struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *filter;
-	struct kvm *kvm = pmc->vcpu->kvm;
 
 	pmc_pause_counter(pmc);
 
 	if (!en_field || !pmc_is_enabled(pmc))
 		return;
 
-	filter = srcu_dereference(kvm->arch.pmu_event_filter, &kvm->srcu);
-	if (filter) {
-		if (filter->action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY &&
-		    test_bit(idx, (ulong *)&filter->fixed_counter_bitmap))
-			return;
-		if (filter->action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW &&
-		    !test_bit(idx, (ulong *)&filter->fixed_counter_bitmap))
-			return;
-	}
+	if (!check_pmu_event_filter(pmc))
+		return;
 
 	if (pmc->current_config == (u64)ctrl && pmc_resume_counter(pmc))
 		return;
-- 
2.35.0


             reply	other threads:[~2022-02-17  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-17  8:36 Like Xu [this message]
2022-02-17  8:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86/pmu: Protect kvm->arch.pmu_event_filter with SRCU Like Xu
2022-02-18 11:20   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 18:25     ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220217083601.24829-1-likexu@tencent.com \
    --to=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=ehankland@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®