From: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/kvm/fpu: Remove kvm_vcpu_arch.guest_supported_xcr0
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 00:43:45 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220218034345.115855-1-leobras@redhat.com> (raw)
kvm_vcpu_arch currently contains the guest supported features in both
guest_supported_xcr0 and guest_fpu.fpstate->user_xfeatures field.
Currently both fields are set to the same value in
kvm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid() and are not changed anywhere else after that.
Since it's not good to keep duplicated data, remove guest_supported_xcr0.
To keep the code more readable, introduce kvm_guest_supported_xcr()
and kvm_guest_supported_xfd() to replace the previous usages of
guest_supported_xcr0.
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220217053028.96432-3-leobras@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
This patch includes a fix from a bug found by "kernel test robot",
regarding compilation of non-x86_64 builds.
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 -
arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 5 +++--
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 6dcccb304775..ec9830d2aabf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -703,7 +703,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
struct fpu_guest guest_fpu;
u64 xcr0;
- u64 guest_supported_xcr0;
struct kvm_pio_request pio;
void *pio_data;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
index 71125291c578..b8f8d268d058 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
@@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best;
+ u64 guest_supported_xcr0;
best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 1, 0);
if (best && apic) {
@@ -293,10 +294,10 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
kvm_apic_set_version(vcpu);
}
- vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xcr0 =
+ guest_supported_xcr0 =
cpuid_get_supported_xcr0(vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries, vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent);
- vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.fpstate->user_xfeatures = vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xcr0;
+ vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.fpstate->user_xfeatures = guest_supported_xcr0;
kvm_update_pv_runtime(vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 641044db415d..ca0fae020961 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -984,6 +984,18 @@ void kvm_load_host_xsave_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_load_host_xsave_state);
+static inline u64 kvm_guest_supported_xcr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.fpstate->user_xfeatures;
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+static inline u64 kvm_guest_supported_xfd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return kvm_guest_supported_xcr0(vcpu) & XFEATURE_MASK_USER_DYNAMIC;
+}
+#endif
+
static int __kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 xcr)
{
u64 xcr0 = xcr;
@@ -1003,7 +1015,7 @@ static int __kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 xcr)
* saving. However, xcr0 bit 0 is always set, even if the
* emulated CPU does not support XSAVE (see kvm_vcpu_reset()).
*/
- valid_bits = vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xcr0 | XFEATURE_MASK_FP;
+ valid_bits = kvm_guest_supported_xcr0(vcpu) | XFEATURE_MASK_FP;
if (xcr0 & ~valid_bits)
return 1;
@@ -3706,8 +3718,7 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XFD))
return 1;
- if (data & ~(XFEATURE_MASK_USER_DYNAMIC &
- vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xcr0))
+ if (data & ~kvm_guest_supported_xfd(vcpu))
return 1;
fpu_update_guest_xfd(&vcpu->arch.guest_fpu, data);
@@ -3717,8 +3728,7 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XFD))
return 1;
- if (data & ~(XFEATURE_MASK_USER_DYNAMIC &
- vcpu->arch.guest_supported_xcr0))
+ if (data & ~kvm_guest_supported_xfd(vcpu))
return 1;
vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.xfd_err = data;
--
2.35.1
reply other threads:[~2022-02-18 3:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220218034345.115855-1-leobras@redhat.com \
--to=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®