mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
To: maz@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, will@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxarm@huawei.com,
	Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] irqchip/gic-v3: use dsb(ishst) to synchronize data to smp before issuing ipi
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 19:19:10 +1300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220220061910.6155-1-21cnbao@gmail.com> (raw)

From: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>

dsb(ishst) should be enough here as we only need to guarantee the
visibility of data to other CPUs in smp inner domain before we
send the ipi.

A micro-benchmark is written to verify the performance impact on
kunpeng920 machine with 2 sockets, each socket has 2 dies, and
each die has 24 CPUs, so totally the system has 2 * 2 * 24 = 96
CPUs. ~2% performance improvement can be seen by this benchmark.

The code of benchmark module:

 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/timekeeping.h>

 volatile int data0 ____cacheline_aligned;
 volatile int data1 ____cacheline_aligned;
 volatile int data2 ____cacheline_aligned;
 volatile int data3 ____cacheline_aligned;
 volatile int data4 ____cacheline_aligned;
 volatile int data5 ____cacheline_aligned;
 volatile int data6 ____cacheline_aligned;

 static void ipi_latency_func(void *val)
 {
 }

 static int __init ipi_latency_init(void)
 {
 	ktime_t stime, etime, delta;
 	int cpu, i;
 	int start = smp_processor_id();

 	stime = ktime_get();
 	for ( i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
 		for (cpu = 0; cpu < 96; cpu++) {
 			data0 = data1 = data2 = data3 = data4 = data5 = data6 = cpu;
 			smp_call_function_single(cpu, ipi_latency_func, NULL, 1);
 		}
 	etime = ktime_get();

 	delta = ktime_sub(etime, stime);

 	printk("%s ipi from cpu%d to cpu0-95 delta of 1000times:%lld\n",
 			__func__, start, delta);

 	return 0;
 }
 module_init(ipi_latency_init);

 static void ipi_latency_exit(void)
 {
 }
 module_exit(ipi_latency_exit);

 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("IPI benchmark");
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

run the below commands 10 times on both Vanilla and the kernel with this
patch:
 # taskset -c 0 insmod test.ko
 # rmmod test

The result on vanilla:
 ipi_latency_init ipi from cpu0 to cpu0-95 delta of 1000times:126757449
 ipi_latency_init ipi from cpu0 to cpu0-95 delta of 1000times:126784249
 ipi_latency_init ipi from cpu0 to cpu0-95 delta of 1000times:126177703
 ipi_latency_init ipi from cpu0 to cpu0-95 delta of 1000times:127022281
 ipi_latency_init ipi from cpu0 to cpu0-95 delta of 1000times:126184883
 ipi_latency_init ipi from cpu0 to cpu0-95 delta of 1000times:127374585
 ipi_latency_init ipi from cpu0 to cpu0-95 delta of 1000times:125778089
 ipi_latency_init ipi from cpu0 to cpu0-95 delta of 1000times:126974441
 ipi_latency_init ipi from cpu0 to cpu0-95 delta of 1000times:127357625
 ipi_latency_init ipi from cpu0 to cpu0-95 delta of 1000times:126228184

The result on the kernel with this patch:
 ipi_latency_init ipi from cpu0 to cpu0-95 delta of 1000times:124467401
 ipi_latency_init ipi from cpu0 to cpu0-95 delta of 1000times:123474209
 ipi_latency_init ipi from cpu0 to cpu0-95 delta of 1000times:123558497
 ipi_latency_init ipi from cpu0 to cpu0-95 delta of 1000times:122993951
 ipi_latency_init ipi from cpu0 to cpu0-95 delta of 1000times:122984223
 ipi_latency_init ipi from cpu0 to cpu0-95 delta of 1000times:123323609
 ipi_latency_init ipi from cpu0 to cpu0-95 delta of 1000times:124507583
 ipi_latency_init ipi from cpu0 to cpu0-95 delta of 1000times:123386963
 ipi_latency_init ipi from cpu0 to cpu0-95 delta of 1000times:123340664
 ipi_latency_init ipi from cpu0 to cpu0-95 delta of 1000times:123285324

Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
---
 -v2: add benchmark and benchmark data in commit log

 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index 5e935d97207d..0efe1a9a9f3b 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -1211,7 +1211,7 @@ static void gic_ipi_send_mask(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask)
 	 * Ensure that stores to Normal memory are visible to the
 	 * other CPUs before issuing the IPI.
 	 */
-	wmb();
+	dsb(ishst);
 
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
 		u64 cluster_id = MPIDR_TO_SGI_CLUSTER_ID(cpu_logical_map(cpu));
-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-02-20  6:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-20  6:19 Barry Song [this message]
2022-02-21 16:39 ` [irqchip: irq/irqchip-next] irqchip/gic-v3: Use dsb(ishst) to order writes with ICC_SGI1R_EL1 accesses irqchip-bot for Barry Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220220061910.6155-1-21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --to=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®