From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, frederic@kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mtosatti@redhat.com, bristot@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] sched/isolation: Use raw_smp_processor_id() in housekeeping_any_cpu()
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 15:15:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220228141550.260119-1-nsaenzju@redhat.com> (raw)
housekeeping_any_cpu() will return a housekeeping CPU. That's it. It'll
try to optimize for NUMA locality and to use the local CPU when
possible, but it's not a requisite.
So let's use raw_smp_processor_id() instead of its vanilla counterpart
in order to allow users to query for housekeeping CPUs without having to
disable preemption.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
---
NOTE: Resent as I forgot to CC the linux mailing list.
include/linux/sched/isolation.h | 2 +-
kernel/sched/isolation.c | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/isolation.h b/include/linux/sched/isolation.h
index 8c15abd67aed..0c09ff1e4599 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/isolation.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/isolation.h
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ extern void __init housekeeping_init(void);
static inline int housekeeping_any_cpu(enum hk_type type)
{
- return smp_processor_id();
+ return raw_smp_processor_id();
}
static inline const struct cpumask *housekeeping_cpumask(enum hk_type type)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
index b4d10815c45a..3b8e1d47bbc0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
@@ -43,14 +43,15 @@ int housekeeping_any_cpu(enum hk_type type)
if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden)) {
if (housekeeping.flags & BIT(type)) {
- cpu = sched_numa_find_closest(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], smp_processor_id());
+ cpu = sched_numa_find_closest(housekeeping.cpumasks[type],
+ raw_smp_processor_id());
if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
return cpu;
return cpumask_any_and(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], cpu_online_mask);
}
}
- return smp_processor_id();
+ return raw_smp_processor_id();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_any_cpu);
--
2.35.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-02-28 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-28 14:15 Nicolas Saenz Julienne [this message]
2022-02-28 14:15 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] tracing: Avoid isolated CPUs when queueing fsnotify irqwork Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2022-02-28 18:07 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-28 18:20 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2022-02-28 19:49 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220228141550.260119-1-nsaenzju@redhat.com \
--to=nsaenzju@redhat.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®