From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/12] perf: x86/core: Add interface to query perfmon_event_map[] directly
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 19:13:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220302111334.12689-9-likexu@tencent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220302111334.12689-1-likexu@tencent.com>
From: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Currently, we have [intel|knc|p4|p6]_perfmon_event_map on the Intel
platforms and amd_[f17h]_perfmon_event_map on the AMD platforms.
Early clumsy KVM code or other potential perf_event users may have
hard-coded these perfmon_maps (e.g., arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c), so
it would not make sense to program a common hardware event based
on the generic "enum perf_hw_id" once the two tables do not match.
Let's provide an interface for callers outside the perf subsystem to get
the counter config based on the perfmon_event_map currently in use,
and it also helps to save bytes.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
---
arch/x86/events/core.c | 11 +++++++++++
arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index e686c5e0537b..e760a1348c62 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -2996,3 +2996,14 @@ void perf_get_x86_pmu_capability(struct x86_pmu_capability *cap)
cap->events_mask_len = x86_pmu.events_mask_len;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_get_x86_pmu_capability);
+
+u64 perf_get_hw_event_config(int hw_event)
+{
+ int max = x86_pmu.max_events;
+
+ if (hw_event < max)
+ return x86_pmu.event_map(array_index_nospec(hw_event, max));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_get_hw_event_config);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index 8fc1b5003713..822927045406 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -477,6 +477,7 @@ struct x86_pmu_lbr {
};
extern void perf_get_x86_pmu_capability(struct x86_pmu_capability *cap);
+extern u64 perf_get_hw_event_config(int hw_event);
extern void perf_check_microcode(void);
extern void perf_clear_dirty_counters(void);
extern int x86_perf_rdpmc_index(struct perf_event *event);
@@ -486,6 +487,11 @@ static inline void perf_get_x86_pmu_capability(struct x86_pmu_capability *cap)
memset(cap, 0, sizeof(*cap));
}
+static inline u64 perf_get_hw_event_config(int hw_event)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
static inline void perf_events_lapic_init(void) { }
static inline void perf_check_microcode(void) { }
#endif
--
2.35.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-02 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-02 11:13 [PATCH v2 00/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Get rid of PERF_TYPE_HARDWAR and other minor fixes Like Xu
2022-03-02 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Update comments for AMD gp counters Like Xu
2022-03-02 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Extract check_pmu_event_filter() from the same semantics Like Xu
2022-03-02 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Pass only "struct kvm_pmc *pmc" to reprogram_counter() Like Xu
2022-03-02 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Drop "u64 eventsel" for reprogram_gp_counter() Like Xu
2022-03-02 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Drop "u8 ctrl, int idx" for reprogram_fixed_counter() Like Xu
2022-03-02 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Use only the uniformly exported interface reprogram_counter() Like Xu
2022-03-02 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Use PERF_TYPE_RAW to merge reprogram_{gp, fixed}counter() Like Xu
2022-03-08 0:36 ` Jim Mattson
2022-03-08 11:43 ` Like Xu
2022-03-02 11:13 ` Like Xu [this message]
2022-03-02 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Replace pmc_perf_hw_id() with perf_get_hw_event_config() Like Xu
2022-03-02 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Drop amd_event_mapping[] in the KVM context Like Xu
2022-03-02 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Protect kvm->arch.pmu_event_filter with SRCU Like Xu
2022-03-02 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: x86/pmu: Clear reserved bit PERF_CTL2[43] for AMD erratum 1292 Like Xu
2022-03-02 17:52 ` Jim Mattson
2022-03-04 9:46 ` Like Xu
2022-03-04 19:06 ` Jim Mattson
2022-03-08 11:25 ` Like Xu
2022-03-08 16:14 ` Jim Mattson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220302111334.12689-9-likexu@tencent.com \
--to=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=likexu@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®