mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
	Siddharth Chandrasekaran <sidcha@amazon.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 06/19] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Don't use sparse_set_to_vcpu_mask() in kvm_hv_send_ipi()
Date: Mon,  7 Mar 2022 15:50:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220307145023.1913205-7-vkuznets@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220307145023.1913205-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>

Get rid of on-stack allocation of vcpu_mask and optimize kvm_hv_send_ipi()
for a smaller number of vCPUs in the request. When Hyper-V TLB flush
is in  use, HvSendSyntheticClusterIpi{,Ex} calls are not commonly used to
send IPIs to a large number of vCPUs (and are rarely used in general).

Introduce hv_is_vp_in_sparse_set() to directly check if the specified
VP_ID is present in sparse vCPU set.

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
index 53eb9540494b..7efa34fb15ef 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
@@ -1760,6 +1760,23 @@ static void sparse_set_to_vcpu_mask(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sparse_banks,
 	}
 }
 
+static bool hv_is_vp_in_sparse_set(u32 vp_id, u64 valid_bank_mask, u64 sparse_banks[])
+{
+	int bank, sbank = 0;
+
+	if (!test_bit(vp_id / 64, (unsigned long *)&valid_bank_mask))
+		return false;
+
+	for_each_set_bit(bank, (unsigned long *)&valid_bank_mask,
+			 KVM_HV_MAX_SPARSE_VCPU_SET_BITS) {
+		if (bank == vp_id / 64)
+			break;
+		sbank++;
+	}
+
+	return test_bit(vp_id % 64, (unsigned long *)&sparse_banks[sbank]);
+}
+
 struct kvm_hv_hcall {
 	u64 param;
 	u64 ingpa;
@@ -2085,8 +2102,8 @@ static u64 kvm_hv_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc)
 		((u64)hc->rep_cnt << HV_HYPERCALL_REP_COMP_OFFSET);
 }
 
-static void kvm_send_ipi_to_many(struct kvm *kvm, u32 vector,
-				 unsigned long *vcpu_bitmap)
+static void kvm_hv_send_ipi_to_many(struct kvm *kvm, u32 vector,
+				    u64 *sparse_banks, u64 valid_bank_mask)
 {
 	struct kvm_lapic_irq irq = {
 		.delivery_mode = APIC_DM_FIXED,
@@ -2096,7 +2113,10 @@ static void kvm_send_ipi_to_many(struct kvm *kvm, u32 vector,
 	unsigned long i;
 
 	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
-		if (vcpu_bitmap && !test_bit(i, vcpu_bitmap))
+		if (sparse_banks &&
+		    !hv_is_vp_in_sparse_set(kvm_hv_get_vpindex(vcpu),
+					    valid_bank_mask,
+					    sparse_banks))
 			continue;
 
 		/* We fail only when APIC is disabled */
@@ -2109,7 +2129,6 @@ static u64 kvm_hv_send_ipi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc)
 	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
 	struct hv_send_ipi_ex send_ipi_ex;
 	struct hv_send_ipi send_ipi;
-	DECLARE_BITMAP(vcpu_mask, KVM_MAX_VCPUS);
 	unsigned long valid_bank_mask;
 	u64 sparse_banks[KVM_HV_MAX_SPARSE_VCPU_SET_BITS];
 	u32 vector;
@@ -2171,13 +2190,7 @@ static u64 kvm_hv_send_ipi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc)
 	if ((vector < HV_IPI_LOW_VECTOR) || (vector > HV_IPI_HIGH_VECTOR))
 		return HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
 
-	if (all_cpus) {
-		kvm_send_ipi_to_many(kvm, vector, NULL);
-	} else {
-		sparse_set_to_vcpu_mask(kvm, sparse_banks, valid_bank_mask, vcpu_mask);
-
-		kvm_send_ipi_to_many(kvm, vector, vcpu_mask);
-	}
+	kvm_hv_send_ipi_to_many(kvm, vector, all_cpus ? NULL : sparse_banks, valid_bank_mask);
 
 ret_success:
 	return HV_STATUS_SUCCESS;
-- 
2.35.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-07 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-07 14:50 [PATCH RFC 00/19] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Fine-grained TLB flush + Direct TLB flush feature Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-07 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 01/19] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Resurrect dedicated KVM_REQ_HV_TLB_FLUSH flag Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-07 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 02/19] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Introduce TLB flush ring Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-07 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 03/19] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Handle HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST{,EX} calls gently Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-07 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 04/19] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Expose support for extended gva ranges for flush hypercalls Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-07 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 05/19] KVM: x86: Prepare kvm_hv_flush_tlb() to handle L2's GPAs Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-07 14:50 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2022-03-07 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 07/19] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Create a separate ring for Direct TLB flush Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-07 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 08/19] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Use preallocated buffer in 'struct kvm_vcpu_hv' instead of on-stack 'sparse_banks' Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-07 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 09/19] KVM: nVMX: Keep track of hv_vm_id/hv_vp_id when eVMCS is in use Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-07 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 10/19] KVM: nSVM: Keep track of Hyper-V hv_vm_id/hv_vp_id Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-07 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 11/19] KVM: x86: Introduce .post_hv_direct_flush() nested hook Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-07 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 12/19] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Introduce kvm_hv_is_tlb_flush_hcall() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-07 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 13/19] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Direct TLB flush Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-07 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 14/19] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Introduce fast kvm_hv_direct_tlb_flush_exposed() check Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-07 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 15/19] x86/hyperv: Fix 'struct hv_enlightened_vmcs' definition Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-07 16:32   ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2022-03-07 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 16/19] KVM: nVMX: hyper-v: Direct TLB flush Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-07 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 17/19] KVM: x86: KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH_CURRENT is a superset of KVM_REQ_HV_TLB_FLUSH too Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-07 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 18/19] KVM: nSVM: hyper-v: Direct TLB flush Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-03-07 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 19/19] KVM: x86: Expose Hyper-V Direct TLB flush feature Vitaly Kuznetsov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220307145023.1913205-7-vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=sidcha@amazon.de \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®