From: Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>
To: <alice.chao@mediatek.com>
Cc: <cc.chou@mediatek.com>, <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>,
<chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com>, <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
<jiajie.hao@mediatek.com>, <jonathan.hsu@mediatek.com>,
<lin.gui@mediatek.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
<powen.kao@mediatek.com>, <qilin.tan@mediatek.com>,
<stanley.chu@mediatek.com>, <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
<yanxu.wei@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] scsi: Fix racing between dev init and dev reset
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 07:23:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220308232333.28978-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220308020725.16116-2-alice.chao@mediatek.com>
Hi Alice,
Thanks for your patch. I have some questions.
> Device reset thread uses kobject_uevent_env() to get kobj.parent
> after scsi_evt_emit(), and it races with device init thread which
> calls device_add() to create kobj.parent before kobject_uevent_env().
>
> Device reset call trace:
> fill_kobj_path
> kobject_get_path
> kobject_uevent_env
> scsi_evt_emit <- add wait_event()
> scsi_evt_thread
>
> Device init call trace:
> fill_kobj_path
> kobject_get_path
> kobject_uevent_env
> device_add <- create kobj.parent
> scsi_target_add
> scsi_sysfs_add_sdev
> scsi_add_lun
> scsi_probe_and_add_lun
These are backtraces, and the things above looks like your solution, not
the problem.
It's better to describe the problem first and solution later:
Device init call: Device reset call:
scsi_probe_and_add_lun() scsi_evt_thread()
scsi_add_lun()
scsi_sysfs_add_sdev() scsi_evt_emit()
scsi_target_add() kobject_uevent_env()
device_add() kobject_get_path() // something wrong?
fill_kobj_path()
get_device_parent() // I see a get, not create parent kobj, could you show me that point?
kobject_uevent()
kobject_uevent_env()
kobject_get_path()
fill_kobj_path()
>
> These two jobs are scheduled asynchronously, we can't guaranteed that
> kobj.parent will be created in device init thread before device reset
> thread calls kobj_get_path().
What happens if device reset thread calls kobj_get_path() before kobj.parent's
creation? a crash or something?
>
> To resolve the racing issue between device init thread and device
> reset thread, we use wait_event() in scsi_evt_emit() to wait for
> device_add() to complete the creation of kobj.parent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Chao <alice.chao@mediatek.com>
When we send patch N+1, we have to put the change log between patch v1 to vN
under a "---", so others can understand the changes between patch N and N+1.
e.g.,
---
Change since v1
- remove Change-Id
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 1 +
> drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index 0a70aa763a96..abf9a71ed77c 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -2461,6 +2461,7 @@ static void scsi_evt_emit(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct scsi_event *evt)
> break;
> case SDEV_EVT_POWER_ON_RESET_OCCURRED:
> envp[idx++] = "SDEV_UA=POWER_ON_RESET_OCCURRED";
> + wait_event(sdev->host->host_wait, sdev->sdev_gendev.kobj.parent != NULL);
> break;
> default:
> /* do nothing */
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> index f4e6c68ac99e..431f229ac435 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> @@ -1904,6 +1904,7 @@ static void do_scsi_scan_host(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
> } else {
> scsi_scan_host_selected(shost, SCAN_WILD_CARD, SCAN_WILD_CARD,
> SCAN_WILD_CARD, 0);
> + wake_up(&shost->host_wait);
do_scsi_scan_host() is not in the call trace above, could you show the relationship
of do_scsi_scan_host in the call flow?
thanks,
Miles
> }
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-09 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-08 2:07 Alice Chao
2022-03-08 23:23 ` Miles Chen [this message]
2022-04-13 6:53 ` Alice Chao
2022-04-14 8:18 ` Miles Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220308232333.28978-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com \
--to=miles.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=alice.chao@mediatek.com \
--cc=cc.chou@mediatek.com \
--cc=chaotian.jing@mediatek.com \
--cc=chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jiajie.hao@mediatek.com \
--cc=jonathan.hsu@mediatek.com \
--cc=lin.gui@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=powen.kao@mediatek.com \
--cc=qilin.tan@mediatek.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=yanxu.wei@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®