From: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
To: Sungup Moon <sungup.moon@samsung.com>
Cc: "kbusch@kernel.org" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>, "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"sagi@grimberg.me" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver/nvme/host: Support duplicated nsid for the private
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 08:08:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220314070808.GB3806@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220314070505epcms2p26dff1d529f4d8c208728e5fa5c5dd928@epcms2p2>
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 04:05:05PM +0900, Sungup Moon wrote:
> When the multi-controller, managed by a special admin command, has private
> namespace with same nsid, current linux driver raise "Duplicate unshared
> namespace" error. But, NVMe Specification defines the NSID usage like this:
>
> If Namespace Management, ANA Reporting, or NVM Sets are supported, the
> NSIDs shall be unique within the NVM subsystem. If the Namespace
> Management, ANA Reporting, and NVM Sets are not supported, then NSIDs:
> a) for shared namespace shall be unique; and
> b) for private namespace are not required to be unique.
> (reference: 6.1.6 NSID and Namespace Usage; NVM Express 1.4c spec)
>
> So, if a multi-controller, which is not managed by Namespace Management
> function, creates some private namespaces without ANA and NVM Sets, the
> duplicated NSID should be allowed because that is not a NVMe specification
> violation.
>
> But, current nvme driver checks only namespace is shared or not, so I
> propose following patch:
> 1. nvme_ctrl has unique_nsid field to identify that controller should
> assign unique nsid.
> 2. nvme_init_ns_head function creates new nvme_ns_head instance not only
> head is null but controller's unique_nsid is false (no flagged
> attribute) and namespace is not shared.
> 3. for creating bdev device file, nvme_mpath_set_disk_name will return
> false when unique_nsid is false and namespace is not shared.
> 4. also, nvme_mpath_alloc_disk alto return 0 with same manner.
From a very quick glance this looks good. But please make sure you don't
spill over 80 charactes per line. Also I think instead of adding the
unique_nsid field a little helper that checks the relevant flags might
be a lіttle nicer. It is not checked in a fast path anywere and the
checks are pretty trivial.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-14 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20220314070505epcms2p26dff1d529f4d8c208728e5fa5c5dd928@epcms2p2>
2022-03-14 7:05 ` Sungup Moon
2022-03-14 7:08 ` hch [this message]
[not found] ` <CGME20220314070505epcms2p26dff1d529f4d8c208728e5fa5c5dd928@epcms2p1>
2022-03-14 9:17 ` Sungup Moon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220314070808.GB3806@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=sungup.moon@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®