From: Phillip Lougher <phillip@squashfs.org.uk>
To: a.fatoum@pengutronix.de
Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
squashfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, phillip.lougher@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Possible performance regression with CONFIG_SQUASHFS_DECOMP_SINGLE
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 05:34:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220316053428.5758-1-phillip@squashfs.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c22a0f1c-883d-5122-ef88-0d7c57ab4e66@pengutronix.de>
Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This an issue we had with v5.15 that we have since successfully worked around.
> I am reporting it here as a pointer in case someone else runs into this and as
> a heads up that there seems to be an underlying performance regression, so
> here it goes:
>
[snip]
>
> Looking through the original kernel configuration we found that it has
> CONFIG_SQUASHFS_DECOMP_SINGLE=y and CONFIG_SQUASHFS_FILE_CACHE=y.
>
> Once changed to CONFIG_SQUASHFS_FILE_DIRECT=y and
> CONFIG_SQUASHFS_DECOMP_MULTI_PERCPU=y, we were below 40s as we want.
This sounds like the slow-down that was introduced by commit c1f6925e1091
"mm: put readahead pages in cache earlier" (Linux V5.8)
This commit prevents Squashfs from doing it's own readahead, which
causes a slow-down in performance. The slow-down is noticable when
using a single decompressor (CONFIG_SQUASHFS_DECOMP_SINGLE=y), and
can be solved by moving to a multi-decompressor configuration, because
it removes contention on a single buffer in the single decompressor case.
This has been already been fixed by commit 9eec1d897139
"squashfs: provide backing_dev_info in order to disable read-ahead"
which is in Linux 5.17-rc1.
Phillip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-16 5:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-15 16:23 Ahmad Fatoum
2022-03-16 5:34 ` Phillip Lougher [this message]
2022-04-04 20:59 ` Ahmad Fatoum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220316053428.5758-1-phillip@squashfs.org.uk \
--to=phillip@squashfs.org.uk \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillip.lougher@gmail.com \
--cc=squashfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®