From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD2EC433F5 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 19:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344360AbiCWTpP (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2022 15:45:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45430 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240384AbiCWTpN (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2022 15:45:13 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B0AE8AE61 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 12:43:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFA89B81FDB for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 19:43:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D83C3C340E8; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 19:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 15:43:38 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Linus Torvalds Cc: LKML , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Beau Belgrave , Tom Zanussi , Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tracing: Updates for 5.18 Message-ID: <20220323154338.200882ac@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20220321105621.3d4a9bc6@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 12:20:33 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 11:56 AM Linus Torvalds > wrote: > > > > Anyway, when I actually compare my resolution to what is in > > linux-next, it turns out they are fairly different. > > Actually, my resolution is fairly similar - but not identical - to > linux-next, but quite different from the one I find in your branch. I > just got confused by having looked at both. I'll take a look at yours. I gave that branch to Stephen to help him resolve it, but didn't look at what he had done to see if it was different. I didn't merge against your branch because when I did the pull request you didn't have the nfsd tree in yet. -- Steve