From: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Brian Johannesmeyer" <bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com>,
Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@vu.nl>,
"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@vu.nl>,
Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: ipmi: replace usage of found with dedicated list iterator variable
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 08:04:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220324070441.56591-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com> (raw)
To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
variable after the loop body.
To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
concluded to use a separate iterator variable instead of a
found boolean [1].
This removes the need to use a found variable and simply checking if
the variable was set, can determine if the break/goto was hit.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
index a5fe2926bf50..0555f68c2dfd 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
@@ -353,29 +353,27 @@ static void ipmi_flush_tx_msg(struct acpi_ipmi_device *ipmi)
static void ipmi_cancel_tx_msg(struct acpi_ipmi_device *ipmi,
struct acpi_ipmi_msg *msg)
{
- struct acpi_ipmi_msg *tx_msg, *temp;
- bool msg_found = false;
+ struct acpi_ipmi_msg *tx_msg = NULL, *iter, *temp;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&ipmi->tx_msg_lock, flags);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(tx_msg, temp, &ipmi->tx_msg_list, head) {
- if (msg == tx_msg) {
- msg_found = true;
- list_del(&tx_msg->head);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, temp, &ipmi->tx_msg_list, head) {
+ if (msg == iter) {
+ tx_msg = iter;
+ list_del(&iter->head);
break;
}
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ipmi->tx_msg_lock, flags);
- if (msg_found)
+ if (tx_msg)
acpi_ipmi_msg_put(tx_msg);
}
static void ipmi_msg_handler(struct ipmi_recv_msg *msg, void *user_msg_data)
{
struct acpi_ipmi_device *ipmi_device = user_msg_data;
- bool msg_found = false;
- struct acpi_ipmi_msg *tx_msg, *temp;
+ struct acpi_ipmi_msg *tx_msg = NULL, *iter, *temp;
struct device *dev = ipmi_device->dev;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -387,16 +385,16 @@ static void ipmi_msg_handler(struct ipmi_recv_msg *msg, void *user_msg_data)
}
spin_lock_irqsave(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock, flags);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(tx_msg, temp, &ipmi_device->tx_msg_list, head) {
- if (msg->msgid == tx_msg->tx_msgid) {
- msg_found = true;
- list_del(&tx_msg->head);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, temp, &ipmi_device->tx_msg_list, head) {
+ if (msg->msgid == iter->tx_msgid) {
+ tx_msg = iter;
+ list_del(&iter->head);
break;
}
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock, flags);
- if (!msg_found) {
+ if (!tx_msg) {
dev_warn(dev,
"Unexpected response (msg id %ld) is returned.\n",
msg->msgid);
@@ -482,15 +480,14 @@ static void ipmi_register_bmc(int iface, struct device *dev)
static void ipmi_bmc_gone(int iface)
{
- struct acpi_ipmi_device *ipmi_device, *temp;
- bool dev_found = false;
+ struct acpi_ipmi_device *ipmi_device = NULL, *iter, *temp;
mutex_lock(&driver_data.ipmi_lock);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(ipmi_device, temp,
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, temp,
&driver_data.ipmi_devices, head) {
- if (ipmi_device->ipmi_ifnum != iface) {
- dev_found = true;
- __ipmi_dev_kill(ipmi_device);
+ if (iter->ipmi_ifnum != iface) {
+ ipmi_device = iter;
+ __ipmi_dev_kill(iter);
break;
}
}
@@ -500,7 +497,7 @@ static void ipmi_bmc_gone(int iface)
struct acpi_ipmi_device, head);
mutex_unlock(&driver_data.ipmi_lock);
- if (dev_found) {
+ if (ipmi_device) {
ipmi_flush_tx_msg(ipmi_device);
acpi_ipmi_dev_put(ipmi_device);
}
base-commit: f443e374ae131c168a065ea1748feac6b2e76613
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-03-24 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-24 7:04 Jakob Koschel [this message]
2022-03-25 17:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220324070441.56591-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com \
--to=jakobkoschel@gmail.com \
--cc=bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com \
--cc=c.giuffrida@vu.nl \
--cc=h.j.bos@vu.nl \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®