From: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
To: Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Brian Johannesmeyer" <bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com>,
Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@vu.nl>,
"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@vu.nl>,
Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] clk: ti: clkctrl: replace usage of found with dedicated list iterator variable
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 08:10:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220324071019.59483-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com> (raw)
To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
variable after the loop body.
To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
concluded to use a separate iterator variable instead of a
found boolean [1].
This removes the need to use a found variable and simply checking if
the variable was set, can determine if the break/goto was hit.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
---
drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c
index 864c484bde1b..f12caef4f9bd 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c
@@ -232,8 +232,7 @@ static struct clk_hw *_ti_omap4_clkctrl_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec,
void *data)
{
struct omap_clkctrl_provider *provider = data;
- struct omap_clkctrl_clk *entry;
- bool found = false;
+ struct omap_clkctrl_clk *entry = NULL, *iter;
if (clkspec->args_count != 2)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
@@ -241,15 +240,15 @@ static struct clk_hw *_ti_omap4_clkctrl_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec,
pr_debug("%s: looking for %x:%x\n", __func__,
clkspec->args[0], clkspec->args[1]);
- list_for_each_entry(entry, &provider->clocks, node) {
- if (entry->reg_offset == clkspec->args[0] &&
- entry->bit_offset == clkspec->args[1]) {
- found = true;
+ list_for_each_entry(iter, &provider->clocks, node) {
+ if (iter->reg_offset == clkspec->args[0] &&
+ iter->bit_offset == clkspec->args[1]) {
+ entry = iter;
break;
}
}
- if (!found)
+ if (!entry)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
return entry->clk;
base-commit: f443e374ae131c168a065ea1748feac6b2e76613
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-03-24 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-24 7:10 Jakob Koschel [this message]
2022-05-03 7:53 ` Tony Lindgren
2022-05-21 3:41 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220324071019.59483-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com \
--to=jakobkoschel@gmail.com \
--cc=bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com \
--cc=c.giuffrida@vu.nl \
--cc=h.j.bos@vu.nl \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®