mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"Brian Johannesmeyer" <bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com>,
	Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@vu.nl>,
	"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@vu.nl>,
	Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: replace usage of found with dedicated list iterator variable
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2022 23:50:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220327215010.2193515-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com> (raw)

To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
variable after the loop body.

To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
concluded to use a separate iterator variable instead of a
found boolean [1].

This removes the need to use a found variable (supported & existed)
and simply checking if the variable was set, can determine if the
break/goto was hit.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c | 30 ++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
index b7aef5b3416d..0b6d5e726ba3 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
@@ -329,35 +329,34 @@ static void cache_btf_id(struct bpf_iter_target_info *tinfo,
 bool bpf_iter_prog_supported(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
 	const char *attach_fname = prog->aux->attach_func_name;
+	struct bpf_iter_target_info *tinfo = NULL, *iter;
 	u32 prog_btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
 	const char *prefix = BPF_ITER_FUNC_PREFIX;
-	struct bpf_iter_target_info *tinfo;
 	int prefix_len = strlen(prefix);
-	bool supported = false;

 	if (strncmp(attach_fname, prefix, prefix_len))
 		return false;

 	mutex_lock(&targets_mutex);
-	list_for_each_entry(tinfo, &targets, list) {
-		if (tinfo->btf_id && tinfo->btf_id == prog_btf_id) {
-			supported = true;
+	list_for_each_entry(iter, &targets, list) {
+		if (iter->btf_id && iter->btf_id == prog_btf_id) {
+			tinfo = iter;
 			break;
 		}
-		if (!strcmp(attach_fname + prefix_len, tinfo->reg_info->target)) {
-			cache_btf_id(tinfo, prog);
-			supported = true;
+		if (!strcmp(attach_fname + prefix_len, iter->reg_info->target)) {
+			cache_btf_id(iter, prog);
+			tinfo = iter;
 			break;
 		}
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&targets_mutex);

-	if (supported) {
+	if (tinfo) {
 		prog->aux->ctx_arg_info_size = tinfo->reg_info->ctx_arg_info_size;
 		prog->aux->ctx_arg_info = tinfo->reg_info->ctx_arg_info;
 	}

-	return supported;
+	return tinfo != NULL;
 }

 const struct bpf_func_proto *
@@ -498,12 +497,11 @@ bool bpf_link_is_iter(struct bpf_link *link)
 int bpf_iter_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr,
 			 struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
+	struct bpf_iter_target_info *tinfo = NULL, *iter;
 	struct bpf_link_primer link_primer;
-	struct bpf_iter_target_info *tinfo;
 	union bpf_iter_link_info linfo;
 	struct bpf_iter_link *link;
 	u32 prog_btf_id, linfo_len;
-	bool existed = false;
 	bpfptr_t ulinfo;
 	int err;

@@ -529,14 +527,14 @@ int bpf_iter_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr,

 	prog_btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
 	mutex_lock(&targets_mutex);
-	list_for_each_entry(tinfo, &targets, list) {
-		if (tinfo->btf_id == prog_btf_id) {
-			existed = true;
+	list_for_each_entry(iter, &targets, list) {
+		if (iter->btf_id == prog_btf_id) {
+			tinfo = iter;
 			break;
 		}
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&targets_mutex);
-	if (!existed)
+	if (!tinfo)
 		return -ENOENT;

 	link = kzalloc(sizeof(*link), GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);

base-commit: b47d5a4f6b8d42f8a8fbe891b36215e4fddc53be
--
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-03-27 21:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-27 21:50 Jakob Koschel [this message]
2022-03-28 15:30 ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220327215010.2193515-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com \
    --to=jakobkoschel@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=c.giuffrida@vu.nl \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=h.j.bos@vu.nl \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®