From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C2DC433F5 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 19:45:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1343792AbiC1Tq5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2022 15:46:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50382 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1343700AbiC1Tpt (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2022 15:45:49 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4038E673CF; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 12:42:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E00E8B81213; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 19:42:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99ABCC340F0; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 19:42:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1648496569; bh=xrPEMS4WZWvZcvanSIXYeLyfdynAP61YiH5f+vYLTWU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cYu7CJqKfoXATdR4POPAkE/FIaIM19jMOg0kODIvDgdW/IU4K/MztyRjGbkFja8KB 38DtWPEbQWw4xiF3H7mRXn8wyv/RIPsoP6HeTk27olAHSA2ai34W3/GfkVc7H28qJJ 2xcrEM3636duHKyVx03tVR8WGyivBoUFUKnFsndleIJsy4qyLUi2Ff3TX9AyroeqVv 24ovFmxhUp2ikLL6ERY2xPy5iIqVC56A8869eDwLp4NzV5DzHKL3P9dSbIfdVn8BMZ XevkKRxOMUtMyYUqEIQ6n5MsZfy7fcKffB3MY3lauZJ6Xsl0qHbrZqFCb/k7lNQLeS AMXJ1xhrQ1oig== From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Josef Bacik , David Sterba , Sasha Levin , clm@fb.com, jbacik@fb.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.16 14/20] btrfs: handle csum lookup errors properly on reads Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 15:42:20 -0400 Message-Id: <20220328194226.1585920-14-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20220328194226.1585920-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20220328194226.1585920-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Josef Bacik [ Upstream commit 1784b7d502a94b561eae58249adde5f72c26eb3c ] Currently any error we get while trying to lookup csums during reads shows up as a missing csum, and then on the read completion side we print an error saying there was a csum mismatch and we increase the device corruption count. However we could have gotten an EIO from the lookup. We could also be inside of a memory constrained container and gotten a ENOMEM while trying to do the read. In either case we don't want to make this look like a file system corruption problem, we want to make it look like the actual error it is. Capture any negative value, convert it to the appropriate blk_status_t, free the csum array if we have one and bail. Note: a possible improvement would be to make the relocation code look up the owning inode and see if it's marked as NODATASUM and set EXTENT_NODATASUM there, that way if there's corruption and there isn't a checksum when we want it we can fail here rather than later. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c index bddb9c87030b..cb9e0e901877 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c @@ -366,6 +366,7 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_lookup_bio_sums(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio, u8 *dst { struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb); struct extent_io_tree *io_tree = &BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree; + struct btrfs_bio *bbio = NULL; struct btrfs_path *path; const u32 sectorsize = fs_info->sectorsize; const u32 csum_size = fs_info->csum_size; @@ -375,6 +376,7 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_lookup_bio_sums(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio, u8 *dst u8 *csum; const unsigned int nblocks = orig_len >> fs_info->sectorsize_bits; int count = 0; + blk_status_t ret = BLK_STS_OK; if (!fs_info->csum_root || (BTRFS_I(inode)->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM)) return BLK_STS_OK; @@ -397,7 +399,7 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_lookup_bio_sums(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio, u8 *dst return BLK_STS_RESOURCE; if (!dst) { - struct btrfs_bio *bbio = btrfs_bio(bio); + bbio = btrfs_bio(bio); if (nblocks * csum_size > BTRFS_BIO_INLINE_CSUM_SIZE) { bbio->csum = kmalloc_array(nblocks, csum_size, GFP_NOFS); @@ -453,21 +455,27 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_lookup_bio_sums(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio, u8 *dst count = search_csum_tree(fs_info, path, cur_disk_bytenr, search_len, csum_dst); - if (count <= 0) { - /* - * Either we hit a critical error or we didn't find - * the csum. - * Either way, we put zero into the csums dst, and skip - * to the next sector. - */ + if (count < 0) { + ret = errno_to_blk_status(count); + if (bbio) + btrfs_bio_free_csum(bbio); + break; + } + + /* + * We didn't find a csum for this range. We need to make sure + * we complain loudly about this, because we are not NODATASUM. + * + * However for the DATA_RELOC inode we could potentially be + * relocating data extents for a NODATASUM inode, so the inode + * itself won't be marked with NODATASUM, but the extent we're + * copying is in fact NODATASUM. If we don't find a csum we + * assume this is the case. + */ + if (count == 0) { memset(csum_dst, 0, csum_size); count = 1; - /* - * For data reloc inode, we need to mark the range - * NODATASUM so that balance won't report false csum - * error. - */ if (BTRFS_I(inode)->root->root_key.objectid == BTRFS_DATA_RELOC_TREE_OBJECTID) { u64 file_offset; @@ -488,7 +496,7 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_lookup_bio_sums(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio, u8 *dst } btrfs_free_path(path); - return BLK_STS_OK; + return ret; } int btrfs_lookup_csums_range(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 start, u64 end, -- 2.34.1