From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eauger@redhat.com,
oupton@google.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
vkuznets@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com,
james.morse@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 13/18] KVM: arm64: Support SDEI_EVENT_{COMPLETE,COMPLETE_AND_RESUME} hypercall
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2022 23:39:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220403153911.12332-14-gshan@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220403153911.12332-1-gshan@redhat.com>
This supports SDEI_EVENT_{COMPLETE, COMPLETE_AND_RESUME} hypercall.
They are used by guest to notify the completion of event in its
handler. The previously interrupted or preempted context is restored
like below.
* x0 - x17, PC and PState are restored to what values we had in
the interrupted or preempted context.
* If it's SDEI_EVENT_COMPLETE_AND_RESUME hypercall, IRQ exception
is injected.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 1 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c | 7 +++
arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c | 29 ++++++++++
arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 117 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index d62405ce3e6d..ca9de9f24923 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ bool kvm_condition_valid32(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_skip_instr32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_inject_undefined(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+void kvm_inject_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_inject_vabt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_inject_dabt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long addr);
void kvm_inject_pabt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long addr);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 951264d4b64d..ac475d3b9151 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -431,6 +431,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
#define KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA32_UND (0 << 9)
#define KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA32_IABT (1 << 9)
#define KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA32_DABT (2 << 9)
+#define KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA32_IRQ (3 << 9)
/* For AArch64: */
#define KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_ELx_SYNC (0 << 9)
#define KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_ELx_IRQ (1 << 9)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c
index c5d009715402..f425ea11e4f6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c
@@ -313,6 +313,9 @@ static void kvm_inject_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
case KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA32_DABT:
enter_exception32(vcpu, PSR_AA32_MODE_ABT, 16);
break;
+ case KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA32_IRQ:
+ enter_exception32(vcpu, PSR_AA32_MODE_IRQ, 24);
+ break;
default:
/* Err... */
break;
@@ -323,6 +326,10 @@ static void kvm_inject_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_EL1):
enter_exception64(vcpu, PSR_MODE_EL1h, except_type_sync);
break;
+ case (KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_ELx_IRQ |
+ KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_EL1):
+ enter_exception64(vcpu, PSR_MODE_EL1h, except_type_irq);
+ break;
default:
/*
* Only EL1_SYNC makes sense so far, EL2_{SYNC,IRQ}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
index b47df73e98d7..c8a8791bdf28 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
@@ -66,6 +66,13 @@ static void inject_undef64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, esr, ESR_EL1);
}
+static void inject_irq64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ vcpu->arch.flags |= (KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_EL1 |
+ KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_ELx_IRQ |
+ KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION);
+}
+
#define DFSR_FSC_EXTABT_LPAE 0x10
#define DFSR_FSC_EXTABT_nLPAE 0x08
#define DFSR_LPAE BIT(9)
@@ -77,6 +84,12 @@ static void inject_undef32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION);
}
+static void inject_irq32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ vcpu->arch.flags |= (KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA32_IRQ |
+ KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION);
+}
+
/*
* Modelled after TakeDataAbortException() and TakePrefetchAbortException
* pseudocode.
@@ -160,6 +173,22 @@ void kvm_inject_undefined(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
inject_undef64(vcpu);
}
+/**
+ * kvm_inject_irq - inject an IRQ into the guest
+ * @vcpu: The vCPU in which to inject IRQ
+ *
+ * Inject IRQs to the target vCPU. It is assumed that this code is
+ * called from the VCPU thread and that the VCPU therefore is not
+ * currently executing guest code.
+ */
+void kvm_inject_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ if (vcpu_el1_is_32bit(vcpu))
+ inject_irq32(vcpu);
+ else
+ inject_irq64(vcpu);
+}
+
void kvm_set_sei_esr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 esr)
{
vcpu_set_vsesr(vcpu, esr & ESR_ELx_ISS_MASK);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c
index 9d18fee59751..ebdbe7810cf0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c
@@ -243,6 +243,79 @@ static unsigned long hypercall_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return ret;
}
+static unsigned long hypercall_complete(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool resume)
+{
+ struct kvm_sdei_vcpu *vsdei = vcpu->arch.sdei;
+ struct kvm_sdei_exposed_event *exposed_event;
+ struct kvm_sdei_event *event;
+ struct kvm_sdei_vcpu_context *context;
+ unsigned int i;
+ unsigned long ret = SDEI_SUCCESS;
+
+ spin_lock(&vsdei->lock);
+
+ /* Check if there is any event being handled */
+ context = &vsdei->context[SDEI_EVENT_PRIORITY_CRITICAL];
+ context = context->event ? context : NULL;
+ context = context ? : &vsdei->context[SDEI_EVENT_PRIORITY_NORMAL];
+ context = context->event ? context : NULL;
+ if (!context) {
+ ret = SDEI_DENIED;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+
+ /* Restore registers: x0 -> x17, PC, PState */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(context->regs); i++)
+ vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, i, context->regs[i]);
+
+ *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = context->pstate;
+ *vcpu_pc(vcpu) = context->pc;
+
+ /* Inject interrupt if needed */
+ if (resume)
+ kvm_inject_irq(vcpu);
+
+ /*
+ * Decrease the event count and invalidate the event in the
+ * vcpu context.
+ */
+ event = context->event;
+ exposed_event = event->exposed_event;
+ context->event = NULL;
+ event->event_count--;
+ if (kvm_sdei_is_critical(exposed_event->priority))
+ vsdei->critical_event_count--;
+ else
+ vsdei->normal_event_count--;
+
+ /*
+ * We need to check if the event is pending for unregistration.
+ * In that case, the event should be disabled and unregistered.
+ * All the pending events are cancelled either.
+ */
+ if (kvm_sdei_is_unregister_pending(event)) {
+ if (kvm_sdei_is_critical(exposed_event->priority))
+ vsdei->critical_event_count -= event->event_count;
+ else
+ vsdei->normal_event_count -= event->event_count;
+
+ event->event_count = 0;
+ kvm_sdei_clear_enabled(event);
+ kvm_sdei_clear_registered(event);
+ kvm_sdei_clear_unregister_pending(event);
+ }
+
+ /* Another request if we have more events to be handled */
+ if (vsdei->critical_event_count > 0 ||
+ vsdei->normal_event_count > 0)
+ kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_SDEI, vcpu);
+
+unlock:
+ spin_unlock(&vsdei->lock);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static unsigned long hypercall_unregister(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_sdei_vcpu *vsdei = vcpu->arch.sdei;
@@ -445,6 +518,12 @@ int kvm_sdei_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
case SDEI_1_0_FN_SDEI_EVENT_CONTEXT:
ret = hypercall_context(vcpu);
break;
+ case SDEI_1_0_FN_SDEI_EVENT_COMPLETE:
+ ret = hypercall_complete(vcpu, false);
+ break;
+ case SDEI_1_0_FN_SDEI_EVENT_COMPLETE_AND_RESUME:
+ ret = hypercall_complete(vcpu, true);
+ break;
case SDEI_1_0_FN_SDEI_EVENT_UNREGISTER:
ret = hypercall_unregister(vcpu);
break;
--
2.23.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-03 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-03 15:38 [PATCH v6 00/18] Support SDEI Virtualization Gavin Shan
2022-04-03 15:38 ` [PATCH v6 01/18] KVM: arm64: Extend smccc_get_argx() Gavin Shan
2022-04-03 15:38 ` [PATCH v6 02/18] KVM: arm64: Route hypercalls based on their owner Gavin Shan
2022-04-21 8:19 ` Oliver Upton
2022-04-22 12:20 ` Gavin Shan
2022-04-22 17:59 ` Oliver Upton
2022-04-23 12:48 ` Gavin Shan
2022-04-03 15:38 ` [PATCH v6 03/18] KVM: arm64: Add SDEI virtualization infrastructure Gavin Shan
2022-04-22 21:48 ` Oliver Upton
2022-04-23 14:18 ` Gavin Shan
2022-04-23 18:43 ` Oliver Upton
2022-04-24 3:00 ` Gavin Shan
2022-04-28 20:28 ` Oliver Upton
2022-04-30 11:38 ` Gavin Shan
2022-04-30 14:16 ` Oliver Upton
2022-05-02 2:35 ` Gavin Shan
2022-05-02 3:40 ` Oliver Upton
2022-05-02 7:25 ` Gavin Shan
2022-05-02 7:57 ` Oliver Upton
2022-05-02 8:23 ` Gavin Shan
2022-04-03 15:38 ` [PATCH v6 04/18] KVM: arm64: Support SDEI_EVENT_REGISTER hypercall Gavin Shan
2022-04-30 14:54 ` Oliver Upton
2022-05-02 2:55 ` Gavin Shan
2022-05-02 3:43 ` Oliver Upton
2022-05-02 7:28 ` Gavin Shan
2022-04-03 15:38 ` [PATCH v6 05/18] KVM: arm64: Support SDEI_EVENT_{ENABLE, DISABLE} Gavin Shan
2022-04-03 15:38 ` [PATCH v6 06/18] KVM: arm64: Support SDEI_EVENT_CONTEXT hypercall Gavin Shan
2022-04-30 15:03 ` Oliver Upton
2022-05-02 2:57 ` Gavin Shan
2022-04-03 15:39 ` [PATCH v6 07/18] KVM: arm64: Support SDEI_EVENT_UNREGISTER hypercall Gavin Shan
2022-04-03 15:39 ` [PATCH v6 08/18] KVM: arm64: Support SDEI_EVENT_STATUS hypercall Gavin Shan
2022-04-03 15:39 ` [PATCH v6 09/18] KVM: arm64: Support SDEI_EVENT_GET_INFO hypercall Gavin Shan
2022-04-03 15:39 ` [PATCH v6 10/18] KVM: arm64: Support SDEI_PE_{MASK, UNMASK} hypercall Gavin Shan
2022-04-04 10:26 ` [PATCH] KVM: arm64: fix returnvar.cocci warnings kernel test robot
2022-04-04 10:54 ` Gavin Shan
2022-04-04 10:29 ` [PATCH v6 10/18] KVM: arm64: Support SDEI_PE_{MASK, UNMASK} hypercall kernel test robot
2022-04-03 15:39 ` [PATCH v6 11/18] KVM: arm64: Support SDEI_{PRIVATE, SHARED}_RESET Gavin Shan
2022-04-03 15:39 ` [PATCH v6 12/18] KVM: arm64: Support SDEI event injection, delivery Gavin Shan
2022-04-03 15:39 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2022-05-01 6:50 ` [PATCH v6 13/18] KVM: arm64: Support SDEI_EVENT_{COMPLETE,COMPLETE_AND_RESUME} hypercall Oliver Upton
2022-05-02 6:19 ` Gavin Shan
2022-05-02 7:38 ` Oliver Upton
2022-05-02 7:51 ` Gavin Shan
2022-04-03 15:39 ` [PATCH v6 14/18] KVM: arm64: Support SDEI_EVENT_SIGNAL hypercall Gavin Shan
2022-04-30 21:32 ` Oliver Upton
2022-05-02 3:04 ` Gavin Shan
2022-04-03 15:39 ` [PATCH v6 15/18] KVM: arm64: Support SDEI_FEATURES hypercall Gavin Shan
2022-05-01 6:55 ` Oliver Upton
2022-05-02 3:05 ` Gavin Shan
2022-04-03 15:39 ` [PATCH v6 16/18] KVM: arm64: Support SDEI_VERSION hypercall Gavin Shan
2022-04-03 15:39 ` [PATCH v6 17/18] KVM: arm64: Expose SDEI capability Gavin Shan
2022-04-03 15:39 ` [PATCH v6 18/18] KVM: selftests: Add SDEI test case Gavin Shan
2022-04-03 15:47 ` [PATCH v6 00/18] Support SDEI Virtualization Gavin Shan
2022-04-04 6:09 ` Oliver Upton
2022-04-04 10:53 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220403153911.12332-14-gshan@redhat.com \
--to=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=eauger@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
--cc=shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®