From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC644C4332F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 13:05:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1349267AbiDDNHO (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2022 09:07:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41988 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1348961AbiDDNHK (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2022 09:07:10 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ACD62C0; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 06:05:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A892210EE; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 13:05:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1649077513; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wC86gbUg8Q4G9+5Yh9zn7w8RySmSqCqeIm64QO9mOtE=; b=RRl3Ow3dGGV/s0GtOYqND8FDvBjDPcuucOKEmxJhaBcg62IE3bwOhSXMJciuwie00la3Dt vIfvgni/VDrCBhutbnKt8xpngOFzHx/wcKTCF8tYsbDVCtNQg+wwBylUkJIqgBiNZBAaT7 Sh95Qo2GYHO9iiR89s0vrUg4OpctFYA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1649077513; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wC86gbUg8Q4G9+5Yh9zn7w8RySmSqCqeIm64QO9mOtE=; b=97OjsjXSzuzMn9M2iOy1/9cSLKyhZw16LE9piwwkUvv526LZ2e1h0R4Z7Gx6tzk2drEP5w WAJgVKn6SFSswSAQ== Received: from quack3.suse.cz (unknown [10.100.224.230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2D46A3B82; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 13:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quack3.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DD60CA0615; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 15:05:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 15:05:11 +0200 From: Jan Kara To: Pavel Machek Cc: Willy Tarreau , Jan Kara , Matthew Wilcox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is it time to remove reiserfs? Message-ID: <20220404130511.rq7evchtxk7s7dre@quack3.lan> References: <20220222100408.cyrdjsv5eun5pzij@quack3.lan> <20220402105454.GA16346@amd> <20220404085535.g2qr4s7itfunlrqb@quack3.lan> <20220404100732.GB1476@duo.ucw.cz> <20220404101802.GB8279@1wt.eu> <20220404105828.GA7162@duo.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220404105828.GA7162@duo.ucw.cz> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! On Mon 04-04-22 12:58:28, Pavel Machek wrote: > > So maybe you're right and there are still a bit more than expected out > > there. However I really think that most users who still have one are in > > the same situation as I am, they're not aware of it. So aside big fat > > warnings at mount time (possibly with an extra delay), there's nothing > > that will make that situation change. > > > > At the very least disabling it by default in Kconfig and in distros > > should be effective. I really don't think that there are still users > > who regularly update their system and who have it on their rootfs, but > > still having data on it, yes, possibly. The earlier they're warned, > > the better. > > I guess we should start by making sure that distributions don't use it > by default. Big fat warning + delay is a bit harsh for that, talking > to them should be enough at this point :-). > > Someone start with Arch Linux ARM. Yeah, I will write them and CC you. Thanks for notifying me. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR