From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: vexpress/spc: Fix doxygen comments
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 15:08:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220405140800.baww2wrow3hdp5ho@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <008aae79-4a6c-721f-7ef5-7b73f6d7e000@infradead.org>
Hi Randy,
On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 05:21:39PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Hi--
>
> On 4/4/22 06:02, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > Kbuild bot reported the following doxygen build warning:
> >
> > | arch/arm/mach-versatile/spc.c:231: warning: This comment starts with
> > | '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment.
> > | Refer Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
> > | * ve_spc_cpu_in_wfi(u32 cpu, u32 cluster)
> >
> > Fix the issue by dropping the parameters specified in the kernel doc.
> >
> > Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
> > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/202204031026.4ogKxt89-lkp@intel.com
> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c
> > index 1c6500c4e6a1..8f99d47d4b89 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c
> > @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static u32 standbywfi_cpu_mask(u32 cpu, u32 cluster)
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > - * ve_spc_cpu_in_wfi(u32 cpu, u32 cluster)
> > + * ve_spc_cpu_in_wfi()
>
> This line still needs a "function short description," e.g.
>
> + * ve_spc_cpu_in_wfi() - fooble the barfloppity
>
> similar to what you did in patch 2/2.
I did this intentionally, I can move only this from the other patch.
Since I saw few others w/o description, I addressed all at once in the
second patch and just remove warning reported in this patch. I am fine
either way.
>
> > *
> > * @cpu: mpidr[7:0] bitfield describing CPU affinity level within cluster
> > * @cluster: mpidr[15:8] bitfield describing cluster affinity level
>
> and I would s/doxygen/kernel-doc/ for both patches.
>
Sure will do.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-06 0:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-04 13:02 Sudeep Holla
2022-04-04 13:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: vexpress/spc: Fix all the doxygen build warnings Sudeep Holla
2022-04-05 0:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: vexpress/spc: Fix doxygen comments Randy Dunlap
2022-04-05 14:08 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2022-04-05 14:54 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-04-07 10:15 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220405140800.baww2wrow3hdp5ho@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®