mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Mitchell <kevmitch@arista.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: kevmitch@arista.com, gal@nvidia.com,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH nf-next v2 1/1] netfilter: conntrack: skip verification of zero UDP checksum
Date: Thu,  7 Apr 2022 21:33:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220408043341.416219-1-kevmitch@arista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220405234739.269371-2-kevmitch@arista.com>

The checksum is optional for UDP packets in IPv4. However nf_reject
would previously require a valid checksum to elicit a response such as
ICMP_DEST_UNREACH.

Add some logic to nf_reject_verify_csum to determine if a UDP packet has
a zero checksum and should therefore not be verified. Explicitly require
a valid checksum for IPv6 consistent RFC 2460 and with the non-netfilter
stack (see udp6_csum_zero_error).

Signed-off-by: Kevin Mitchell <kevmitch@arista.com>
---
 include/net/netfilter/nf_reject.h   | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
 net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.c | 10 +++++++---
 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c |  4 ++--
 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_reject.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_reject.h
index 9051c3a0c8e7..f248c1ff8b22 100644
--- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_reject.h
+++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_reject.h
@@ -5,12 +5,34 @@
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include <uapi/linux/in.h>
 
-static inline bool nf_reject_verify_csum(__u8 proto)
+static inline bool nf_reject_verify_csum(struct sk_buff *skb, int dataoff,
+					  __u8 proto)
 {
 	/* Skip protocols that don't use 16-bit one's complement checksum
 	 * of the entire payload.
 	 */
 	switch (proto) {
+		/* Protocols with optional checksums. */
+		case IPPROTO_UDP: {
+			const struct udphdr *udp_hdr;
+			struct udphdr _udp_hdr;
+
+			/* Checksum is required in IPv6
+			 * see RFC 2460 section 8.1
+			 */
+			if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6))
+				return true;
+
+			udp_hdr = skb_header_pointer(skb, dataoff,
+						     sizeof(_udp_hdr),
+						     &_udp_hdr);
+			if (!udp_hdr || udp_hdr->check)
+				return true;
+
+			return false;
+		}
+		case IPPROTO_GRE:
+
 		/* Protocols with other integrity checks. */
 		case IPPROTO_AH:
 		case IPPROTO_ESP:
@@ -19,9 +41,6 @@ static inline bool nf_reject_verify_csum(__u8 proto)
 		/* Protocols with partial checksums. */
 		case IPPROTO_UDPLITE:
 		case IPPROTO_DCCP:
-
-		/* Protocols with optional checksums. */
-		case IPPROTO_GRE:
 			return false;
 	}
 	return true;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.c
index 4eed5afca392..6c46d4e8ab84 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.c
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ struct sk_buff *nf_reject_skb_v4_unreach(struct net *net,
 	unsigned int len;
 	__wsum csum;
 	u8 proto;
+	int dataoff;
 
 	if (!nf_reject_iphdr_validate(oldskb))
 		return NULL;
@@ -99,10 +100,11 @@ struct sk_buff *nf_reject_skb_v4_unreach(struct net *net,
 	if (pskb_trim_rcsum(oldskb, ntohs(ip_hdr(oldskb)->tot_len)))
 		return NULL;
 
+	dataoff = ip_hdrlen(oldskb);
 	proto = ip_hdr(oldskb)->protocol;
 
 	if (!skb_csum_unnecessary(oldskb) &&
-	    nf_reject_verify_csum(proto) &&
+	    nf_reject_verify_csum(oldskb, dataoff, proto) &&
 	    nf_ip_checksum(oldskb, hook, ip_hdrlen(oldskb), proto))
 		return NULL;
 
@@ -312,6 +314,7 @@ void nf_send_unreach(struct sk_buff *skb_in, int code, int hook)
 {
 	struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb_in);
 	u8 proto = iph->protocol;
+	int dataoff = ip_hdrlen(skb_in);
 
 	if (iph->frag_off & htons(IP_OFFSET))
 		return;
@@ -320,12 +323,13 @@ void nf_send_unreach(struct sk_buff *skb_in, int code, int hook)
 	    nf_reject_fill_skb_dst(skb_in) < 0)
 		return;
 
-	if (skb_csum_unnecessary(skb_in) || !nf_reject_verify_csum(proto)) {
+	if (skb_csum_unnecessary(skb_in) ||
+	    !nf_reject_verify_csum(skb_in, dataoff, proto)) {
 		icmp_send(skb_in, ICMP_DEST_UNREACH, code, 0);
 		return;
 	}
 
-	if (nf_ip_checksum(skb_in, hook, ip_hdrlen(skb_in), proto) == 0)
+	if (nf_ip_checksum(skb_in, hook, dataoff, proto) == 0)
 		icmp_send(skb_in, ICMP_DEST_UNREACH, code, 0);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_send_unreach);
diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c
index dffeaaaadcde..f61d4f18e1cf 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static bool nf_reject_v6_csum_ok(struct sk_buff *skb, int hook)
 	if (thoff < 0 || thoff >= skb->len || (fo & htons(~0x7)) != 0)
 		return false;
 
-	if (!nf_reject_verify_csum(proto))
+	if (!nf_reject_verify_csum(skb, thoff, proto))
 		return true;
 
 	return nf_ip6_checksum(skb, hook, thoff, proto) == 0;
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static bool reject6_csum_ok(struct sk_buff *skb, int hook)
 	if (thoff < 0 || thoff >= skb->len || (fo & htons(~0x7)) != 0)
 		return false;
 
-	if (!nf_reject_verify_csum(proto))
+	if (!nf_reject_verify_csum(skb, thoff, proto))
 		return true;
 
 	return nf_ip6_checksum(skb, hook, thoff, proto) == 0;
-- 
2.35.1


       reply	other threads:[~2022-04-08  4:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20220405234739.269371-2-kevmitch@arista.com>
2022-04-08  4:33 ` Kevin Mitchell [this message]
2022-04-27 14:36   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-04-30  3:40     ` [PATCH nf-next v3] " Kevin Mitchell
2022-05-09  6:06       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220408043341.416219-1-kevmitch@arista.com \
    --to=kevmitch@arista.com \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=gal@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®