mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 5/5] rcu/nocb: Initialize nocb kthreads only for boot CPU prior SMP initialization
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 15:56:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220418225642.3945539-5-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220418225633.GA3945428@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>

From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

The rcu_spawn_gp_kthread() function is called as an early initcall, which
means that SMP initialization hasn't happened yet and only the boot CPU is
online. Therefore, create only the NOCB kthreads related to the boot CPU.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c      |  6 +++++-
 kernel/rcu/tree.h      |  1 -
 kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 20 --------------------
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 70b33c55d39a..9f7441a78f90 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -4498,9 +4498,13 @@ static int __init rcu_spawn_gp_kthread(void)
 	smp_store_release(&rcu_state.gp_kthread, t);  /* ^^^ */
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
 	wake_up_process(t);
-	rcu_spawn_nocb_kthreads();
 	/* This is a pre-SMP initcall, we expect a single CPU */
 	WARN_ON(num_online_cpus() > 1);
+	/*
+	 * Those kthreads couldn't be created on rcu_init() -> rcutree_prepare_cpu()
+	 * due to rcu_scheduler_fully_active.
+	 */
+	rcu_spawn_cpu_nocb_kthread(smp_processor_id());
 	rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(rdp->mynode);
 	rcu_spawn_core_kthreads();
 	return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index b2a0f2613ab9..25dc4166f218 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -439,7 +439,6 @@ static int rcu_nocb_need_deferred_wakeup(struct rcu_data *rdp, int level);
 static bool do_nocb_deferred_wakeup(struct rcu_data *rdp);
 static void rcu_boot_init_nocb_percpu_data(struct rcu_data *rdp);
 static void rcu_spawn_cpu_nocb_kthread(int cpu);
-static void __init rcu_spawn_nocb_kthreads(void);
 static void show_rcu_nocb_state(struct rcu_data *rdp);
 static void rcu_nocb_lock(struct rcu_data *rdp);
 static void rcu_nocb_unlock(struct rcu_data *rdp);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
index 3c00240833d6..46694e13398a 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
@@ -1266,22 +1266,6 @@ static void rcu_spawn_cpu_nocb_kthread(int cpu)
 	WRITE_ONCE(rdp->nocb_gp_kthread, rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread);
 }
 
-/*
- * Once the scheduler is running, spawn rcuo kthreads for all online
- * no-CBs CPUs.  This assumes that the early_initcall()s happen before
- * non-boot CPUs come online -- if this changes, we will need to add
- * some mutual exclusion.
- */
-static void __init rcu_spawn_nocb_kthreads(void)
-{
-	int cpu;
-
-	if (rcu_state.nocb_is_setup) {
-		for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
-			rcu_spawn_cpu_nocb_kthread(cpu);
-	}
-}
-
 /* How many CB CPU IDs per GP kthread?  Default of -1 for sqrt(nr_cpu_ids). */
 static int rcu_nocb_gp_stride = -1;
 module_param(rcu_nocb_gp_stride, int, 0444);
@@ -1538,10 +1522,6 @@ static void rcu_spawn_cpu_nocb_kthread(int cpu)
 {
 }
 
-static void __init rcu_spawn_nocb_kthreads(void)
-{
-}
-
 static void show_rcu_nocb_state(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 {
 }
-- 
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23


      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-18 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-18 22:56 [PATCH rcu 0/5] Callback-offloading (NOCB) updates for v5.19 Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-18 22:56 ` [PATCH rcu 1/5] rcu: Remove rcu_is_nocb_cpu() Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-18 22:56 ` [PATCH rcu 2/5] rcu/nocb: Move rcu_nocb_is_setup to rcu_state Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-18 22:56 ` [PATCH rcu 3/5] rcu: Assume rcu_init() is called before smp Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-18 22:56 ` [PATCH rcu 4/5] rcu: Initialize boost kthread only for boot node prior SMP initialization Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-18 22:56 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220418225642.3945539-5-paulmck@kernel.org \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=uladzislau.rezki@sony.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®