From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rcu 04/11] kernel/smp: Provide boot-time timeout for CSD lock diagnostics
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:46:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220419134616.GE4285@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220419085607.2014-1-hdanton@sina.com>
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 04:56:07PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 15:53:52 -0700 Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Debugging of problems involving insanely long-running SMI handlers
> > proceeds better if the CSD-lock timeout can be adjusted. This commit
> > therefore provides a new smp.csd_lock_timeout kernel boot parameter
> > that specifies the timeout in milliseconds. The default remains at the
> > previously hard-coded value of five seconds.
> >
> > Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> > Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 11 +++++++++++
> > kernel/smp.c | 7 +++++--
> > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > index 3f1cc5e317ed..645c4c001b16 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > @@ -5377,6 +5377,17 @@
> > smart2= [HW]
> > Format: <io1>[,<io2>[,...,<io8>]]
> >
> > + smp.csd_lock_timeout= [KNL]
> > + Specify the period of time in milliseconds
> > + that smp_call_function() and friends will wait
> > + for a CPU to release the CSD lock. This is
> > + useful when diagnosing bugs involving CPUs
> > + disabling interrupts for extended periods
> > + of time. Defaults to 5,000 milliseconds, and
> > + setting a value of zero disables this feature.
> > + This feature may be more efficiently disabled
> > + using the csdlock_debug- kernel parameter.
> > +
>
> Can non-responsive CSD lock detected trigger syzbot (warning) report?
If they enable it by building with CONFIG_CSD_LOCK_WAIT_DEBUG=y, yes.
Thanx, Paul
> Hillf
> > smsc-ircc2.nopnp [HW] Don't use PNP to discover SMC devices
> > smsc-ircc2.ircc_cfg= [HW] Device configuration I/O port
> > smsc-ircc2.ircc_sir= [HW] SIR base I/O port
> > diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> > index 01a7c1706a58..d82439bac401 100644
> > --- a/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> > @@ -183,7 +183,9 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(smp_call_func_t, cur_csd_func);
> > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, cur_csd_info);
> > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cfd_seq_local, cfd_seq_local);
> >
> > -#define CSD_LOCK_TIMEOUT (5ULL * NSEC_PER_SEC)
> > +static ulong csd_lock_timeout = 5000; /* CSD lock timeout in milliseconds. */
> > +module_param(csd_lock_timeout, ulong, 0444);
> > +
> > static atomic_t csd_bug_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> > static u64 cfd_seq;
> >
> > @@ -329,6 +331,7 @@ static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(struct __call_single_data *csd, u64 ts0, u64 *
> > u64 ts2, ts_delta;
> > call_single_data_t *cpu_cur_csd;
> > unsigned int flags = READ_ONCE(csd->node.u_flags);
> > + unsigned long long csd_lock_timeout_ns = csd_lock_timeout * NSEC_PER_MSEC;
> >
> > if (!(flags & CSD_FLAG_LOCK)) {
> > if (!unlikely(*bug_id))
> > @@ -341,7 +344,7 @@ static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(struct __call_single_data *csd, u64 ts0, u64 *
> >
> > ts2 = sched_clock();
> > ts_delta = ts2 - *ts1;
> > - if (likely(ts_delta <= CSD_LOCK_TIMEOUT))
> > + if (likely(ts_delta <= csd_lock_timeout_ns || csd_lock_timeout_ns <= 0))
> > return false;
> >
> > firsttime = !*bug_id;
> > --
> > 2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-19 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-18 22:53 [PATCH rcu 0/11] Miscellaneous fixes for v5.19 Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-18 22:53 ` [PATCH rcu 01/11] rcu: Clarify fill-the-gap comment in rcu_segcblist_advance() Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-18 22:53 ` [PATCH rcu 02/11] rcu: Fix rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore() strict QS reporting Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-18 22:53 ` [PATCH rcu 03/11] rcu: Check for jiffies going backwards Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-18 22:53 ` [PATCH rcu 04/11] kernel/smp: Provide boot-time timeout for CSD lock diagnostics Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-19 7:11 ` Juergen Gross
2022-04-19 16:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-18 22:53 ` [PATCH rcu 05/11] rcu: Add comments to final rcu_gp_cleanup() "if" statement Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-18 22:53 ` [PATCH rcu 06/11] rcu: Print number of online CPUs in RCU CPU stall-warning messages Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-18 22:53 ` [PATCH rcu 07/11] rcu: Fix preemption mode check on synchronize_rcu[_expedited]() Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-18 22:53 ` [PATCH rcu 08/11] srcu: Drop needless initialization of sdp in srcu_gp_start() Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-18 22:53 ` [PATCH rcu 09/11] rcu: Check for successful spawn of ->boost_kthread_task Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-18 22:53 ` [PATCH rcu 10/11] rcu_sync: Fix comment to properly reflect rcu_sync_exit() behavior Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-18 22:53 ` [PATCH rcu 11/11] rcu: Use IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD() to avoid rcu_read_unlock() hangs Paul E. McKenney
[not found] ` <20220419085607.2014-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2022-04-19 13:46 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2022-04-19 14:11 ` [PATCH rcu 04/11] kernel/smp: Provide boot-time timeout for CSD lock diagnostics Dmitry Vyukov
2022-04-19 16:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
[not found] ` <20220419231820.2089-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2022-04-20 12:17 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-04-20 13:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-20 14:00 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-04-20 14:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220419134616.GE4285@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1 \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®