mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>,
	Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] elf: Fix the arm64 MTE ELF segment name and value
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 16:18:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220425151833.2603830-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com> (raw)

Unfortunately, the name/value choice for the MTE ELF segment type
(PT_ARM_MEMTAG_MTE) was pretty poor: LOPROC+1 is already in use by
PT_AARCH64_UNWIND, as defined in the AArch64 ELF ABI
(https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/main/aaelf64/aaelf64.rst).

Update the ELF segment type value to LOPROC+2 and also change the define
to PT_AARCH64_MEMTAG_MTE to match the AArch64 ELF ABI namespace. The
AArch64 ELF ABI document is updating accordingly (segment type not
previously mentioned in the document).

Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Fixes: 761b9b366cec ("elf: Introduce the ARM MTE ELF segment type")
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
Cc: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
---

Luckily, the commit being fixed here only went in for 5.18-rc1, so there is no
ABI change in a mainline release.

FYI, the corresponding pull request for the AArch64 ELF ABI:

https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/pull/148

I don't expect any further change to the segment name/value.

 Documentation/arm64/memory-tagging-extension.rst | 4 ++--
 arch/arm64/kernel/elfcore.c                      | 2 +-
 include/uapi/linux/elf.h                         | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/memory-tagging-extension.rst b/Documentation/arm64/memory-tagging-extension.rst
index dd27f78d7608..dbae47bba25e 100644
--- a/Documentation/arm64/memory-tagging-extension.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arm64/memory-tagging-extension.rst
@@ -228,10 +228,10 @@ Core dump support
 -----------------
 
 The allocation tags for user memory mapped with ``PROT_MTE`` are dumped
-in the core file as additional ``PT_ARM_MEMTAG_MTE`` segments. The
+in the core file as additional ``PT_AARCH64_MEMTAG_MTE`` segments. The
 program header for such segment is defined as:
 
-:``p_type``: ``PT_ARM_MEMTAG_MTE``
+:``p_type``: ``PT_AARCH64_MEMTAG_MTE``
 :``p_flags``: 0
 :``p_offset``: segment file offset
 :``p_vaddr``: segment virtual address, same as the corresponding
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/elfcore.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/elfcore.c
index 2b3f3d0544b9..98d67444a5b6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/elfcore.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/elfcore.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ int elf_core_write_extra_phdrs(struct coredump_params *cprm, loff_t offset)
 	for_each_mte_vma(current, vma) {
 		struct elf_phdr phdr;
 
-		phdr.p_type = PT_ARM_MEMTAG_MTE;
+		phdr.p_type = PT_AARCH64_MEMTAG_MTE;
 		phdr.p_offset = offset;
 		phdr.p_vaddr = vma->vm_start;
 		phdr.p_paddr = 0;
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/elf.h b/include/uapi/linux/elf.h
index 787c657bfae8..7ce993e6786c 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/elf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/elf.h
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ typedef __s64	Elf64_Sxword;
 
 
 /* ARM MTE memory tag segment type */
-#define PT_ARM_MEMTAG_MTE	(PT_LOPROC + 0x1)
+#define PT_AARCH64_MEMTAG_MTE	(PT_LOPROC + 0x2)
 
 /*
  * Extended Numbering

             reply	other threads:[~2022-04-25 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-25 15:18 Catalin Marinas [this message]
2022-04-28 13:50 ` Will Deacon
2022-04-28 17:09 ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220425151833.2603830-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®