From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33687C433F5 for ; Wed, 4 May 2022 22:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1379681AbiEDW6W (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2022 18:58:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45364 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1379447AbiEDWyz (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2022 18:54:55 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x649.google.com (mail-pl1-x649.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::649]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F9B353B79 for ; Wed, 4 May 2022 15:51:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x649.google.com with SMTP id n4-20020a170902f60400b00158d1f2d442so1364458plg.18 for ; Wed, 04 May 2022 15:51:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=reply-to:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:from:to:cc; bh=OWG5SLItV7LvwK0/+ikCwsRpvTwxCQso8sF2TQ8YEnM=; b=ZKmlmJzgZ4JzKhUTbhH/I23KY5Z5b9VMBKo2xMRFMz4DyZYFE1KeNik9OF9C1kIfOb C+wkpKW+2XJK1OpC6JaSAJO6mW3VZWzjjuyhBz/AmD6unr6E61RtFbMe0UI7Iz2QkXN+ LmD8WqRwtRxB1GK4S1OFQhAmIpkUWwsUDf1s2xN3P5+68+CUeVVsfCmBjOozHroon29H 1H+4vGaQn+fVH9X+1U/Niartr7vBgEcUKjLD8oy7Z/QSL0U3yTaLckillZxtgS4FukTD dJDGhsCJZzuwcX3CjlFQsca7aPq4I65JIb8V6lx7qdmNFC1XkrYlKQdmesliekVCi+tL iIGQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=OWG5SLItV7LvwK0/+ikCwsRpvTwxCQso8sF2TQ8YEnM=; b=P6O53Sk3OkT1ndYdjDmZxgNZveGJ9gFoRr8AVZSE3UWdIP+w7C5U3F6Al9OB9OgDyb Vk8jQIimQmeUsNQqNT6NbzQoq7hYbNdxy2Ta8mtJHpFiZ922QFADnPqkUmDUa32Ge4BY 14TFc57Hpc9CSbnv9fs/Z+YqIevfaxM+vlm481VayVfyk1fYB/wHuWUcj+cekqdtWWZp Vd1H/n1vLAA7Ca7PrNkP25W/COJmxded4h8ZgQ0COEipYtSpyP96RXrEKHHEA0HUyD0K +Ew5J3jco5C/ZoWkn8sxGY6L68jUDMh4FA+LaV8zHv+rN5zetpJpY8otDsJhoJ3apx8H ba1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530FL0QrXatHHnatN3ET4pY9B7VDbJzbz0eF25qZFHVP4TFTZ7HH Jsjmxy2FV+Tg90ARq/SMIjbxQELneU4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQ8JxwciwXyutSnLiak0iPf/I4/7Pb7TMZbIng41hMdouKE1AZNzAS3U3i4cka2H01LwsrA/ZjdLs= X-Received: from seanjc.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:3e5]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:aa7:8892:0:b0:50e:1463:3cd1 with SMTP id z18-20020aa78892000000b0050e14633cd1mr8550029pfe.13.1651704665764; Wed, 04 May 2022 15:51:05 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: Sean Christopherson Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 22:48:01 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20220504224914.1654036-1-seanjc@google.com> Message-Id: <20220504224914.1654036-56-seanjc@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20220504224914.1654036-1-seanjc@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.36.0.464.gb9c8b46e94-goog Subject: [PATCH 055/128] KVM: selftests: Convert sync_regs_test away from VCPU_ID From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Vitaly Kuznetsov , Andrew Jones , David Matlack , Ben Gardon , Oliver Upton , Sean Christopherson Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Convert sync_regs_test to use vm_create_with_one_vcpu() and pass around a 'struct kvm_vcpu' object instead of using a global VCPU_ID. Note, this is a "functional" change in the sense that the test now creates a vCPU with vcpu_id==0 instead of vcpu_id==5. The non-zero VCPU_ID was 100% arbitrary and added little to no validation coverage. If testing non-zero vCPU IDs is desirable for generic tests, that can be done in the future by tweaking the VM creation helpers. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson --- .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c | 52 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c index fc03a150278d..c971706b49f5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c @@ -20,8 +20,6 @@ #include "kvm_util.h" #include "processor.h" -#define VCPU_ID 5 - #define UCALL_PIO_PORT ((uint16_t)0x1000) struct ucall uc_none = { @@ -84,6 +82,7 @@ static void compare_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu_events *left, int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; struct kvm_vm *vm; struct kvm_run *run; struct kvm_regs regs; @@ -104,57 +103,56 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) exit(KSFT_SKIP); } - /* Create VM */ - vm = vm_create_default(VCPU_ID, 0, guest_code); + vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_code); - run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID); + run = vcpu->run; /* Request reading invalid register set from VCPU. */ run->kvm_valid_regs = INVALID_SYNC_FIELD; - rv = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID); + rv = _vcpu_run(vm, vcpu->id); TEST_ASSERT(rv < 0 && errno == EINVAL, "Invalid kvm_valid_regs did not cause expected KVM_RUN error: %d\n", rv); - vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID)->kvm_valid_regs = 0; + run->kvm_valid_regs = 0; run->kvm_valid_regs = INVALID_SYNC_FIELD | TEST_SYNC_FIELDS; - rv = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID); + rv = _vcpu_run(vm, vcpu->id); TEST_ASSERT(rv < 0 && errno == EINVAL, "Invalid kvm_valid_regs did not cause expected KVM_RUN error: %d\n", rv); - vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID)->kvm_valid_regs = 0; + run->kvm_valid_regs = 0; /* Request setting invalid register set into VCPU. */ run->kvm_dirty_regs = INVALID_SYNC_FIELD; - rv = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID); + rv = _vcpu_run(vm, vcpu->id); TEST_ASSERT(rv < 0 && errno == EINVAL, "Invalid kvm_dirty_regs did not cause expected KVM_RUN error: %d\n", rv); - vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID)->kvm_dirty_regs = 0; + run->kvm_dirty_regs = 0; run->kvm_dirty_regs = INVALID_SYNC_FIELD | TEST_SYNC_FIELDS; - rv = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID); + rv = _vcpu_run(vm, vcpu->id); TEST_ASSERT(rv < 0 && errno == EINVAL, "Invalid kvm_dirty_regs did not cause expected KVM_RUN error: %d\n", rv); - vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID)->kvm_dirty_regs = 0; + run->kvm_dirty_regs = 0; /* Request and verify all valid register sets. */ /* TODO: BUILD TIME CHECK: TEST_ASSERT(KVM_SYNC_X86_NUM_FIELDS != 3); */ run->kvm_valid_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS; - rv = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID); + rv = _vcpu_run(vm, vcpu->id); TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO, "Unexpected exit reason: %u (%s),\n", run->exit_reason, exit_reason_str(run->exit_reason)); - vcpu_regs_get(vm, VCPU_ID, ®s); + vcpu_regs_get(vm, vcpu->id, ®s); compare_regs(®s, &run->s.regs.regs); - vcpu_sregs_get(vm, VCPU_ID, &sregs); + vcpu_sregs_get(vm, vcpu->id, &sregs); compare_sregs(&sregs, &run->s.regs.sregs); - vcpu_events_get(vm, VCPU_ID, &events); + vcpu_events_get(vm, vcpu->id, &events); compare_vcpu_events(&events, &run->s.regs.events); /* Set and verify various register values. */ @@ -164,7 +162,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) run->kvm_valid_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS; run->kvm_dirty_regs = KVM_SYNC_X86_REGS | KVM_SYNC_X86_SREGS; - rv = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID); + rv = _vcpu_run(vm, vcpu->id); TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO, "Unexpected exit reason: %u (%s),\n", run->exit_reason, @@ -176,13 +174,13 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) "apic_base sync regs value incorrect 0x%llx.", run->s.regs.sregs.apic_base); - vcpu_regs_get(vm, VCPU_ID, ®s); + vcpu_regs_get(vm, vcpu->id, ®s); compare_regs(®s, &run->s.regs.regs); - vcpu_sregs_get(vm, VCPU_ID, &sregs); + vcpu_sregs_get(vm, vcpu->id, &sregs); compare_sregs(&sregs, &run->s.regs.sregs); - vcpu_events_get(vm, VCPU_ID, &events); + vcpu_events_get(vm, vcpu->id, &events); compare_vcpu_events(&events, &run->s.regs.events); /* Clear kvm_dirty_regs bits, verify new s.regs values are @@ -191,7 +189,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) run->kvm_valid_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS; run->kvm_dirty_regs = 0; run->s.regs.regs.rbx = 0xDEADBEEF; - rv = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID); + rv = _vcpu_run(vm, vcpu->id); TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO, "Unexpected exit reason: %u (%s),\n", run->exit_reason, @@ -208,8 +206,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) run->kvm_dirty_regs = 0; run->s.regs.regs.rbx = 0xAAAA; regs.rbx = 0xBAC0; - vcpu_regs_set(vm, VCPU_ID, ®s); - rv = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID); + vcpu_regs_set(vm, vcpu->id, ®s); + rv = _vcpu_run(vm, vcpu->id); TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO, "Unexpected exit reason: %u (%s),\n", run->exit_reason, @@ -217,7 +215,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) TEST_ASSERT(run->s.regs.regs.rbx == 0xAAAA, "rbx sync regs value incorrect 0x%llx.", run->s.regs.regs.rbx); - vcpu_regs_get(vm, VCPU_ID, ®s); + vcpu_regs_get(vm, vcpu->id, ®s); TEST_ASSERT(regs.rbx == 0xBAC0 + 1, "rbx guest value incorrect 0x%llx.", regs.rbx); @@ -229,7 +227,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) run->kvm_valid_regs = 0; run->kvm_dirty_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS; run->s.regs.regs.rbx = 0xBBBB; - rv = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID); + rv = _vcpu_run(vm, vcpu->id); TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO, "Unexpected exit reason: %u (%s),\n", run->exit_reason, @@ -237,7 +235,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) TEST_ASSERT(run->s.regs.regs.rbx == 0xBBBB, "rbx sync regs value incorrect 0x%llx.", run->s.regs.regs.rbx); - vcpu_regs_get(vm, VCPU_ID, ®s); + vcpu_regs_get(vm, vcpu->id, ®s); TEST_ASSERT(regs.rbx == 0xBBBB + 1, "rbx guest value incorrect 0x%llx.", regs.rbx); -- 2.36.0.464.gb9c8b46e94-goog