From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86/pmu: Drop redundant-clumsy-asymmetric PERFCTR_CORE MSRs handling
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 18:22:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220509102204.62389-3-likexu@tencent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220509102204.62389-1-likexu@tencent.com>
From: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
In commit c51eb52b8f98 ("KVM: x86: Add support for AMD Core Perf Extension
in guest"), the entry "case MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL0 ... MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR5 " is
introduced asymmetrically into kvm_get_msr_common(), ignoring the set part.
The missing guest PERFCTR_CORE cpuid check from the above commit leads to
the commit c28fa560c5bb ("KVM: x86/vPMU: Forbid reading from MSR_F15H_PERF
MSRs when guest doesn't have X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE"), but it simply
duplicates the default entry at the end of the switch statement explicitly.
Removing the PERFCTR_CORE MSRs entry in kvm_get_msr_common() thoroughly
would be more maintainable, as we did for the same group of MSRs in the
kvm_set_msr_common() at the very beginning when the feature was enabled.
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 4790f0d7d40b..2b9089701ef5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -3841,13 +3841,6 @@ int kvm_get_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
case MSR_DRAM_ENERGY_STATUS: /* DRAM controller */
msr_info->data = 0;
break;
- case MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL0 ... MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR5:
- if (kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr(vcpu, msr_info->index))
- return kvm_pmu_get_msr(vcpu, msr_info);
- if (!msr_info->host_initiated)
- return 1;
- msr_info->data = 0;
- break;
case MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 ... MSR_K7_EVNTSEL3:
case MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 ... MSR_K7_PERFCTR3:
case MSR_P6_PERFCTR0 ... MSR_P6_PERFCTR1:
--
2.36.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-09 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-09 10:22 [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86/pmu: Ignore pmu->global_ctrl check if vPMU doesn't support global_ctrl Like Xu
2022-05-09 10:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86/pmu: Don't pre-set the pmu->global_ctrl when refreshing Like Xu
2022-05-10 4:37 ` [PATCH V2 " Like Xu
2022-05-10 4:44 ` [PATCH v2] " Like Xu
2022-05-20 14:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-15 9:22 ` [KVM] db16e9b28b: kvm-unit-tests.pmu.fail kernel test robot
2022-05-15 9:25 ` Like Xu
2022-05-24 13:36 ` Oliver Sang
2022-05-09 10:22 ` Like Xu [this message]
2022-05-20 14:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86/pmu: Drop redundant-clumsy-asymmetric PERFCTR_CORE MSRs handling Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220509102204.62389-3-likexu@tencent.com \
--to=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®