From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jack@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2] ext4: fix bug_on in ext4_writepages
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 15:47:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220511134710.4ggvxuxg7dwf7tkp@quack3.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220510100228.1172227-1-yebin10@huawei.com>
On Tue 10-05-22 18:02:28, Ye Bin wrote:
> we got issue as follows:
> EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:1141: group 0, block bitmap and bg descriptor inconsistent: 25 vs 31513 free cls
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:2708!
> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
> CPU: 2 PID: 2147 Comm: rep Not tainted 5.18.0-rc2-next-20220413+ #155
> RIP: 0010:ext4_writepages+0x1977/0x1c10
> RSP: 0018:ffff88811d3e7880 EFLAGS: 00010246
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffff88811c098000
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88811c098000 RDI: 0000000000000002
> RBP: ffff888128140f50 R08: ffffffffb1ff6387 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000007 R11: ffffed10250281ea R12: 0000000000000001
> R13: 00000000000000a4 R14: ffff88811d3e7bb8 R15: ffff888128141028
> FS: 00007f443aed9740(0000) GS:ffff8883aef00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 0000000020007200 CR3: 000000011c2a4000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> do_writepages+0x130/0x3a0
> filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x83/0xa0
> filemap_flush+0xab/0xe0
> ext4_alloc_da_blocks+0x51/0x120
> __ext4_ioctl+0x1534/0x3210
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x12c/0x170
> do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
>
> It may happen as follows:
> 1. write inline_data inode
> vfs_write
> new_sync_write
> ext4_file_write_iter
> ext4_buffered_write_iter
> generic_perform_write
> ext4_da_write_begin
> ext4_da_write_inline_data_begin -> If inline data size too
> small will allocate block to write, then mapping will has
> dirty page
> ext4_da_convert_inline_data_to_extent ->clear EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA
> 2. fallocate
> do_vfs_ioctl
> ioctl_preallocate
> vfs_fallocate
> ext4_fallocate
> ext4_convert_inline_data
> ext4_convert_inline_data_nolock
> ext4_map_blocks -> fail will goto restore data
> ext4_restore_inline_data
> ext4_create_inline_data
> ext4_write_inline_data
> ext4_set_inode_state -> set inode EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA
> 3. writepages
> __ext4_ioctl
> ext4_alloc_da_blocks
> filemap_flush
> filemap_fdatawrite_wbc
> do_writepages
> ext4_writepages
> if (ext4_has_inline_data(inode))
> BUG_ON(ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA))
>
> The root cause of this issue is we destory inline data until call ext4_writepages
> under delay allocation mode. But there maybe already covert from inline to extent.
> To solved this issue, we call filemap_flush firstly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/inline.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inline.c b/fs/ext4/inline.c
> index 6d253edebf9f..130ed5d83734 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inline.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inline.c
> @@ -2002,6 +2002,14 @@ int ext4_convert_inline_data(struct inode *inode)
> if (!ext4_has_inline_data(inode)) {
> ext4_clear_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA);
> return 0;
> + } else if (test_opt(inode->i_sb, DELALLOC) && !S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
> + error = filemap_flush(inode->i_mapping);
This is actually an interesting option and I kind of like it but shouldn't
we restrict this to the situation when EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA is clear?
Otherwise we would be writing out inline data to the inode unnecessarily
for each ext4_convert_inline_data() call.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-11 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-10 10:02 Ye Bin
2022-05-11 13:47 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2022-05-14 9:28 ` yebin
2022-05-16 1:09 ` yebin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220511134710.4ggvxuxg7dwf7tkp@quack3.lan \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yebin10@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®