mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
To: ardb@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-dev@igalia.com,
	kernel@gpiccoli.net, anton@enomsg.org, ccross@android.com,
	keescook@chromium.org, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk,
	matthew.garrett@nebula.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
	"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] UEFI panic notification mechanism
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 16:50:26 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220520195028.1347426-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com> (raw)

Hi folks, this patch set is about a mechanism to notify the UEFI
firmware about a panic event in the kernel, so the firmware is
enabled to take some action. The specific use case for us is to
show an alternative splash screen if a panic happened.
The base for the idea is to explore the panic notifiers mechanism,
that allows a callback to execute in the panic path.

Patch 1 is kind of a "clean-up" in a way; just taking a helper out
of efibc and adding it on generic efi.h header, so we have common
code used by 3 modules (efibc, efi-pstore and efi-panic).

Patch 2 is the efi-panic module itself; it is *strongly* based on
efibc, and for that I'd like to hereby thank to the authors.
The efibc code is very clear!


Some design decisions to be discussed:

(1) The variable name and value - I called it PanicWarn, and the
data it holds is just a byte, set by default to 0xFF (though users
can change that via module parameter). I have no attachment to
these, we can improve naming and the size of the data for example,
suggestions are appreciated!


(2) The 3 modules (efibc, efi-pstore and efi-panic) share a lot of
ideas or code; both efi-{pstore,panic} deal with panic events, and
both efi{bc,-panic} rely on notifiers and share code.
Should we unify some of them or anything like that? It seemed to me
the proper approach would be a simple and small standalone module,
but I'm open for suggestions.


(3) I've noticed a behavior that also happens in efi-pstore, I'm not
sure if that's something to care about. In the efi-panic module, after
a fresh boot, we check if PanicWarn is there an if so, we print a
message and _delete_ that variable from the NVRAM. But...the variable
is still present in sysfs, in the list created by efivars. Same happens
with efi-pstore, if we delete the dumps generated from /sys/fs/pstore.

In my case, I've used the __efivar_entry_delete() variant, so it doesn't
delete from any list, only from the firmware area. Should this be handled?
Or we just don't care with the empty variable reference in the sysfs tree?


I appreciate feedbacks and suggestions, thanks in advance for the attention!
Cheers,


Guilherme


Guilherme G. Piccoli (2):
  efi: Add a generic helper to convert strings to unicode
  efi-panic: Introduce the UEFI panic notification module

 drivers/firmware/efi/Kconfig      | 10 ++++
 drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile     |  1 +
 drivers/firmware/efi/efi-panic.c  | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/firmware/efi/efi-pstore.c |  5 +-
 drivers/firmware/efi/efibc.c      | 16 ++---
 include/linux/efi.h               | 16 +++++
 6 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/efi/efi-panic.c

-- 
2.36.0


             reply	other threads:[~2022-05-20 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-20 19:50 Guilherme G. Piccoli [this message]
2022-05-20 19:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] efi: Add a generic helper to convert strings to unicode Guilherme G. Piccoli
2022-05-20 19:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] efi-panic: Introduce the UEFI panic notification module Guilherme G. Piccoli
2022-06-02 17:39 ` [PATCH 0/2] UEFI panic notification mechanism Guilherme G. Piccoli
2022-06-28  7:49   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-06-28 18:10     ` Guilherme G. Piccoli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220520195028.1347426-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com \
    --to=gpiccoli@igalia.com \
    --cc=anton@enomsg.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=ccross@android.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
    --cc=kernel@gpiccoli.net \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®